Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests/bpf: Update LLVM Phabricator links

[Nathan Chancellor]

Hi Alexei,

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 12:00:50PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:40 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Yonghong,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 08:05:36PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/9/24 2:16 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > > reviews.llvm.org was LLVM's Phabricator instances for code review. It
> > > > has been abandoned in favor of GitHub pull requests. While the majority
> > > > of links in the kernel sources still work because of the work Fangrui
> > > > has done turning the dynamic Phabricator instance into a static archive,
> > > > there are some issues with that work, so preemptively convert all the
> > > > links in the kernel sources to point to the commit on GitHub.
> > > >
> > > > Most of the commits have the corresponding differential review link in
> > > > the commit message itself so there should not be any loss of fidelity in
> > > > the relevant information.
> > > >
> > > > Additionally, fix a typo in the xdpwall.c print ("LLMV" -> "LLVM") while
> > > > in the area.
> > > >
> > > > Link: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/update-on-github-pull-requests/71540/172
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Ack with one nit below.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > > @@ -304,6 +304,6 @@ from running test_progs will look like:
> > > >   .. code-block:: console
> > > > -  test_xdpwall:FAIL:Does LLVM have https://reviews.llvm.org/D109073? unexpected error: -4007
> > > > +  test_xdpwall:FAIL:Does LLVM have https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ea72b0319d7b0f0c2fcf41d121afa5d031b319d5? unexpected error: -4007
> > > > -__ https://reviews.llvm.org/D109073
> > > > +__ https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ea72b0319d7b0f0c2fcf41d121afa5d031b319d
> > >
> > > To be consistent with other links, could you add the missing last alnum '5' to the above link?
> >
> > Thanks a lot for catching this and providing an ack. Andrew, could you
> > squash this update into selftests-bpf-update-llvm-phabricator-links.patch?
> 
> Please send a new patch.
> We'd like to take all bpf patches through the bpf tree to avoid conflicts.

Very well, I've sent a standalone v2 on top of bpf-next:

https://lore.kernel.org/20240111-bpf-update-llvm-phabricator-links-v2-1-9a7ae976bd64@xxxxxxxxxx/

Andrew, just drop selftests-bpf-update-llvm-phabricator-links.patch
altogether in that case, the other two patches are fine to go via -mm I
think.

Cheers,
Nathan