Re: [PATCH V1 1/2] scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 12.01.2024 16:33, Nitin Rawat wrote:
> Commit 3f6d1767b1a0 ("phy: ufs-qcom: Refactor all init steps into
> phy_poweron") removes the phy_power_on/off from ufs_qcom_setup_clocks
> to suspend/resume func.
> 
> To have a better power saving, remove the phy_power_on/off calls from
> resume/suspend path and put them back to ufs_qcom_setup_clocks, so that
> PHY's regulators & clks can be turned on/off along with UFS's clocks.
> 
> Since phy phy_power_on is separated out from phy calibrate, make
> separate calls to phy_power_on and phy_calibrate calls from ufs qcom
> driver.
> 
> Also add a mutex lock to protect the usage of is_phy_pwr_on against
> possible racing.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h |   4 ++
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index 39eef470f8fa..2721a30f0db8 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -338,6 +338,46 @@ static u32 ufs_qcom_get_hs_gear(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  	return UFS_HS_G3;
>  }
> 
> +static int ufs_qcom_phy_power_on(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
> +	struct phy *phy = host->generic_phy;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&host->phy_mutex);

guard(mutex)(&host->phy_mutex);

and you can drop the _unlock calls

> +	if (!host->is_phy_pwr_on) {
> +		ret = phy_power_on(phy);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&host->phy_mutex);
> +			return ret;

And with the _unlock now being unnecessary, you can rewrite this
as:

if (!host->is_phy_pwr_on) {
	ret = phy_power_on(phy);
	if (!ret)
		host->is_phy_pwr_on = true;
}

return ret
> +		}
> +		host->is_phy_pwr_on = true;
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&host->phy_mutex);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

[...]

>  static int ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  {
>  	struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
> @@ -378,13 +418,18 @@ static int ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  		goto out_disable_phy;
> 
>  	/* power on phy - start serdes and phy's power and clocks */
> -	ret = phy_power_on(phy);
> +	ret = ufs_qcom_phy_power_on(hba);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: phy power on failed, ret = %d\n",
>  			__func__, ret);
>  		goto out_disable_phy;
>  	}
> 
> +	ret = phy_calibrate(phy);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed to calibrate PHY %d\n",
> +				  __func__, ret);
> +	}

You can drop the overly verbose __func__, unwrap the line and remove the
curly braces, similar for dev_err-s below

Actually, shouldn't this error out if calibrate fails??

Konrad