Re: [PATCH] drm/ci: Add msm tests

[Vignesh Raman]

Hi Rob,

On 12/01/24 22:44, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 7:57 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:42 AM Vignesh Raman
> > <vignesh.raman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > >
> > > On 09/01/24 01:20, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > The msm tests should skip on non-msm hw, so I think it should be safe to
> > > > enable everywhere.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >    1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
> > > > index f82cd90372f4..eaeb751bb0ad 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
> > > > @@ -2910,3 +2910,52 @@ kms_writeback@writeback-invalid-parameters
> > > >    kms_writeback@writeback-fb-id
> > > >    kms_writeback@writeback-check-output
> > > >    prime_mmap_kms@buffer-sharing
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-sanitycheck-8
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-sanitycheck-32
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-8
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-32
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-madvise-8
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-madvise-32
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-oom-8
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-oom-32
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-sanitycheck-8
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-sanitycheck-32
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-8
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-32
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-madvise-8
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-madvise-32
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-oom-8
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-oom-32
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-sanitycheck-8
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-sanitycheck-32
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-8
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-32
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-madvise-8
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-madvise-32
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-oom-8
> > > > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-oom-32
> > > > +msm_mapping@ring
> > > > +msm_mapping@sqefw
> > > > +msm_mapping@shadow
> > > > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-10-bos
> > > > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-10-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > > > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-100-bos
> > > > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-100-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > > > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-250-bos
> > > > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-250-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > > > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-500-bos
> > > > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-500-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > > > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-1000-bos
> > > > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-1000-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > > > +msm_recovery@hangcheck
> > > > +msm_recovery@gpu-fault
> > > > +msm_recovery@gpu-fault-parallel
> > > > +msm_recovery@iova-fault
> > > > +msm_submit@empty-submit
> > > > +msm_submit@invalid-queue-submit
> > > > +msm_submit@invalid-flags-submit
> > > > +msm_submit@invalid-in-fence-submit
> > > > +msm_submit@invalid-duplicate-bo-submit
> > > > +msm_submit@invalid-cmd-idx-submit
> > > > +msm_submit@invalid-cmd-type-submit
> > > > +msm_submit@valid-submit
> > >
> > > I tested this patch with latest drm-misc/drm-misc-next and there was
> > > some failures seen for the newly added msm tests. I have updated the
> > > xfails with below commit,
> > >
> > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/vigneshraman/linux/-/commit/d012893597a661d6ebbb755bf2607dfb055524a1
> > >
> > > I will notify the maintainers about the flaky tests, update the url in
> > > the flakes.txt, and submit a separate patch for this change.
>
> Oh, you should probably move msm_mapping@* to skips on sdm845.  I had
> a closer look at those, and they are failing due to a bootloader/fw
> issue.  We work around this in mesa CI with these two patches:
>
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux/-/commit/4b49f902ec6f2bb382cbbf489870573f4b43371e
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux/-/commit/38cdf4c5559771e2474ae0fecef8469f65147bc1
>
> But given that sdm845 is similar to sc7180 as far as kernel gpu
> driver, it is probably just better to skip these on sdm845 (with a
> comment referring to the hack patches we use in mesa CI)

I have sent a patch with these changes,

https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20240115101750.27077-1-vignesh.raman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

Thanks.

Regards,
Vignesh