Re: [PATCH stable] x86/microcode: do not cache microcode if it will not be used
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Mon Jan 15 2024 - 05:57:15 EST
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 11:22:02AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> [ Upstream commit a7939f01672034a58ad3fdbce69bb6c665ce0024 ]
>
> Builtin/initrd microcode will not be used the ucode loader is disabled.
> But currently, save_microcode_in_initrd is always performed and it
> accesses MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV even if dis_ucode_ldr is true, and in
> particular even if X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR is set; the TDX module does not
> implement the MSR and the result is a call trace at boot for TDX guests.
>
> Mainline Linux fixed this as part of a more complex rework of microcode
> caching that went into 6.7 (see in particular commits dd5e3e3ca6,
> "x86/microcode/intel: Simplify early loading"; and a7939f0167203,
> "x86/microcode/amd: Cache builtin/initrd microcode early"). Do the bare
> minimum in stable kernels, setting initrd_gone just like mainline Linux
> does in mark_initrd_gone().
>
> Note that save_microcode_in_initrd() is not in the microcode application
> path, which runs with paging disabled on 32-bit systems, so it can (and
> has to) use dis_ucode_ldr instead of check_loader_disabled_ap().
.. simply because save_microcode_in_initrd() is a fs_initcall and by
then 32-bit has managed to enable paging.
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v6.6+
> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx # v6.6+
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> index 35d39a13dc90..503b5da56685 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> @@ -214,6 +214,11 @@ static int __init save_microcode_in_initrd(void)
> struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
> int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> + if (dis_ucode_ldr) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> switch (c->x86_vendor) {
> case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
> if (c->x86 >= 6)
> @@ -227,6 +230,7 @@ static int __init save_microcode_in_initrd(void)
> break;
> }
>
> +out:
> initrd_gone = true;
>
> return ret;
> --
Makes sense to me.
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette