Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] arm64/mm: Wire up PTE_CONT for user mappings
From: Ryan Roberts
Date: Mon Jan 15 2024 - 11:27:31 EST
On 15/01/2024 15:14, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> On 18/12/2023 11:50, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> With the ptep API sufficiently refactored, we can now introduce a new
>> "contpte" API layer, which transparently manages the PTE_CONT bit for
>> user mappings. Whenever it detects a set of PTEs that meet the
>> requirements for a contiguous range, the PTEs are re-painted with the
>> PTE_CONT bit. Use of contpte mappings is intended to be transparent to
>> the core-mm, which continues to interact with individual ptes.
>>
>> Since a contpte block only has a single access and dirty bit, the
>> semantic here changes slightly; when getting a pte (e.g. ptep_get())
>> that is part of a contpte mapping, the access and dirty information are
>> pulled from the block (so all ptes in the block return the same
>> access/dirty info). When changing the access/dirty info on a pte (e.g.
>> ptep_set_access_flags()) that is part of a contpte mapping, this change
>> will affect the whole contpte block. This is works fine in practice
>> since we guarantee that only a single folio is mapped by a contpte
>> block, and the core-mm tracks access/dirty information per folio.
>>
>> This initial change provides a baseline that can be optimized in future
>> commits. That said, fold/unfold operations (which imply tlb
>> invalidation) are avoided where possible with a few tricks for
>> access/dirty bit management. Write-protect modifications for contpte
>> mappings are currently non-optimal, and incure a regression in fork()
>> performance. This will be addressed in follow-up changes.
>>
>> In order for the public functions, which used to be pure inline, to
>> continue to be callable by modules, export all the contpte_* symbols
>> that are now called by those public inline functions.
>>
>> The feature is enabled/disabled with the ARM64_CONTPTE Kconfig parameter
>> at build time. It defaults to enabled as long as its dependency,
>> TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is also enabled. The core-mm depends upon
>> TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE to be able to allocate large folios, so if its not
>> enabled, then there is no chance of meeting the physical contiguity
>> requirement for contpte mappings.
>>
>> Tested-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 10 +-
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 184 +++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c | 388 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 582 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index 7b071a00425d..de76e484ff3a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -2209,6 +2209,15 @@ config UNWIND_PATCH_PAC_INTO_SCS
>> select UNWIND_TABLES
>> select DYNAMIC_SCS
>> +config ARM64_CONTPTE
>> + bool "Contiguous PTE mappings for user memory" if EXPERT
>> + depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>> + default y
>> + help
>> + When enabled, user mappings are configured using the PTE contiguous
>> + bit, for any mappings that meet the size and alignment requirements.
>> + This reduces TLB pressure and improves performance.
>> +
>> endmenu # "Kernel Features"
>> menu "Boot options"
>> @@ -2318,4 +2327,3 @@ endmenu # "CPU Power Management"
>> source "drivers/acpi/Kconfig"
>> source "arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig"
>> -
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index 6930c14f062f..e64120452301 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -133,6 +133,10 @@ static inline pteval_t __phys_to_pte_val(phys_addr_t phys)
>> */
>> #define pte_valid_not_user(pte) \
>> ((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER | PTE_UXN)) == (PTE_VALID |
>> PTE_UXN))
>> +/*
>> + * Returns true if the pte is valid and has the contiguous bit set.
>> + */
>> +#define pte_valid_cont(pte) (pte_valid(pte) && pte_cont(pte))
>> /*
>> * Could the pte be present in the TLB? We must check mm_tlb_flush_pending
>> * so that we don't erroneously return false for pages that have been
>> @@ -1116,6 +1120,184 @@ extern void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct
>> vm_area_struct *vma,
>> unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>> pte_t old_pte, pte_t new_pte);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_CONTPTE
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The contpte APIs are used to transparently manage the contiguous bit in ptes
>> + * where it is possible and makes sense to do so. The PTE_CONT bit is considered
>> + * a private implementation detail of the public ptep API (see below).
>> + */
>> +extern void __contpte_try_fold(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte);
>> +extern void __contpte_try_unfold(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte);
>> +extern pte_t contpte_ptep_get(pte_t *ptep, pte_t orig_pte);
>> +extern pte_t contpte_ptep_get_lockless(pte_t *orig_ptep);
>> +extern void contpte_set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr);
>> +extern int contpte_ptep_test_and_clear_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep);
>> +extern int contpte_ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep);
>> +extern int contpte_ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>> + pte_t entry, int dirty);
>> +
>> +static inline void contpte_try_fold(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Only bother trying if both the virtual and physical addresses are
>> + * aligned and correspond to the last entry in a contig range. The core
>> + * code mostly modifies ranges from low to high, so this is the likely
>> + * the last modification in the contig range, so a good time to fold.
>> + * We can't fold special mappings, because there is no associated folio.
>> + */
>> +
>> + const unsigned long contmask = CONT_PTES - 1;
>> + bool valign = (((unsigned long)ptep >> 3) & contmask) == contmask;
>> + bool palign = (pte_pfn(pte) & contmask) == contmask;
>> +
>> + if (valign && palign &&
>> + pte_valid(pte) && !pte_cont(pte) && !pte_special(pte))
>> + __contpte_try_fold(mm, addr, ptep, pte);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void contpte_try_unfold(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>> +{
>> + if (pte_valid_cont(pte))
>> + __contpte_try_unfold(mm, addr, ptep, pte);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The below functions constitute the public API that arm64 presents to the
>> + * core-mm to manipulate PTE entries within their page tables (or at least this
>> + * is the subset of the API that arm64 needs to implement). These public
>> + * versions will automatically and transparently apply the contiguous bit where
>> + * it makes sense to do so. Therefore any users that are contig-aware (e.g.
>> + * hugetlb, kernel mapper) should NOT use these APIs, but instead use the
>> + * private versions, which are prefixed with double underscore. All of these
>> + * APIs except for ptep_get_lockless() are expected to be called with the PTL
>> + * held.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define ptep_get ptep_get
>> +static inline pte_t ptep_get(pte_t *ptep)
>> +{
>> + pte_t pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>> +
>> + if (!pte_valid_cont(pte))
>> + return pte;
>> +
>> + return contpte_ptep_get(ptep, pte);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define ptep_get_lockless ptep_get_lockless
>> +static inline pte_t ptep_get_lockless(pte_t *ptep)
>> +{
>> + pte_t pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>> +
>> + if (!pte_valid_cont(pte))
>> + return pte;
>> +
>> + return contpte_ptep_get_lockless(ptep);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void set_pte(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * We don't have the mm or vaddr so cannot unfold or fold contig entries
>> + * (since it requires tlb maintenance). set_pte() is not used in core
>> + * code, so this should never even be called. Regardless do our best to
>> + * service any call and emit a warning if there is any attempt to set a
>> + * pte on top of an existing contig range.
>> + */
>> + pte_t orig_pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>> +
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(pte_valid_cont(orig_pte));
>> + __set_pte(ptep, pte_mknoncont(pte));
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define set_ptes set_ptes
>> +static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
>> +{
>> + pte = pte_mknoncont(pte);
>> +
>> + if (nr == 1) {
>> + contpte_try_unfold(mm, addr, ptep, __ptep_get(ptep));
>> + __set_ptes(mm, addr, ptep, pte, 1);
>> + contpte_try_fold(mm, addr, ptep, pte);
>> + } else
>> + contpte_set_ptes(mm, addr, ptep, pte, nr);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void pte_clear(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>> +{
>> + contpte_try_unfold(mm, addr, ptep, __ptep_get(ptep));
>> + __pte_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_GET_AND_CLEAR
>> +static inline pte_t ptep_get_and_clear(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>> +{
>> + contpte_try_unfold(mm, addr, ptep, __ptep_get(ptep));
>> + return __ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_TEST_AND_CLEAR_YOUNG
>> +static inline int ptep_test_and_clear_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>> +{
>> + pte_t orig_pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>> +
>> + if (!pte_valid_cont(orig_pte))
>> + return __ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, addr, ptep);
>> +
>> + return contpte_ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, addr, ptep);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR_YOUNG_FLUSH
>> +static inline int ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>> +{
>> + pte_t orig_pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>> +
>> + if (!pte_valid_cont(orig_pte))
>> + return __ptep_clear_flush_young(vma, addr, ptep);
>> +
>> + return contpte_ptep_clear_flush_young(vma, addr, ptep);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_SET_WRPROTECT
>> +static inline void ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>> +{
>> + contpte_try_unfold(mm, addr, ptep, __ptep_get(ptep));
>> + __ptep_set_wrprotect(mm, addr, ptep);
>> + contpte_try_fold(mm, addr, ptep, __ptep_get(ptep));
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_SET_ACCESS_FLAGS
>> +static inline int ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>> + pte_t entry, int dirty)
>> +{
>> + pte_t orig_pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>> +
>> + entry = pte_mknoncont(entry);
>> +
>> + if (!pte_valid_cont(orig_pte))
>> + return __ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr, ptep, entry, dirty);
>> +
>> + return contpte_ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr, ptep, entry, dirty);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#else /* CONFIG_ARM64_CONTPTE */
>> +
>> #define ptep_get __ptep_get
>> #define set_pte __set_pte
>> #define set_ptes __set_ptes
>> @@ -1131,6 +1313,8 @@ extern void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct
>> vm_area_struct *vma,
>> #define __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_SET_ACCESS_FLAGS
>> #define ptep_set_access_flags __ptep_set_access_flags
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_CONTPTE */
>> +
>> #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>> #endif /* __ASM_PGTABLE_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
>> index dbd1bc95967d..60454256945b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ obj-y := dma-mapping.o extable.o fault.o init.o \
>> cache.o copypage.o flush.o \
>> ioremap.o mmap.o pgd.o mmu.o \
>> context.o proc.o pageattr.o fixmap.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_CONTPTE) += contpte.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) += hugetlbpage.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_CORE) += ptdump.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_DEBUGFS) += ptdump_debugfs.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c b/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..69c36749dd98
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,388 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2023 ARM Ltd.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/mm.h>
>> +#include <linux/export.h>
>> +#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>> +
>> +static inline bool mm_is_user(struct mm_struct *mm)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Don't attempt to apply the contig bit to kernel mappings, because
>> + * dynamically adding/removing the contig bit can cause page faults.
>> + * These racing faults are ok for user space, since they get serialized
>> + * on the PTL. But kernel mappings can't tolerate faults.
>> + */
>> + return mm != &init_mm;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline pte_t *contpte_align_down(pte_t *ptep)
>> +{
>> + return (pte_t *)(ALIGN_DOWN((unsigned long)ptep >> 3, CONT_PTES) << 3);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ptep_clear_flush_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, int nr)
>> +{
>> + struct vm_area_struct vma = TLB_FLUSH_VMA(mm, 0);
>> + unsigned long start_addr = addr;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE)
>> + __pte_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
>> +
>> + __flush_tlb_range(&vma, start_addr, addr, PAGE_SIZE, true, 3);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool ptep_any_valid(pte_t *ptep, int nr)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, ptep++) {
>> + if (pte_valid(__ptep_get(ptep)))
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void contpte_convert(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>> +{
>> + struct vm_area_struct vma = TLB_FLUSH_VMA(mm, 0);
>> + unsigned long start_addr;
>> + pte_t *start_ptep;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + start_ptep = ptep = contpte_align_down(ptep);
>> + start_addr = addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, CONT_PTE_SIZE);
>> + pte = pfn_pte(ALIGN_DOWN(pte_pfn(pte), CONT_PTES), pte_pgprot(pte));
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < CONT_PTES; i++, ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
>> + pte_t ptent = __ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
>> +
>> + if (pte_dirty(ptent))
>> + pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
>> +
>> + if (pte_young(ptent))
>> + pte = pte_mkyoung(pte);
>> + }
>> +
>> + __flush_tlb_range(&vma, start_addr, addr, PAGE_SIZE, true, 3);
>> +
>> + __set_ptes(mm, start_addr, start_ptep, pte, CONT_PTES);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __contpte_try_fold(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * We have already checked that the virtual and pysical addresses are
>> + * correctly aligned for a contpte mapping in contpte_try_fold() so the
>> + * remaining checks are to ensure that the contpte range is fully
>> + * covered by a single folio, and ensure that all the ptes are valid
>> + * with contiguous PFNs and matching prots. We ignore the state of the
>> + * access and dirty bits for the purpose of deciding if its a contiguous
>> + * range; the folding process will generate a single contpte entry which
>> + * has a single access and dirty bit. Those 2 bits are the logical OR of
>> + * their respective bits in the constituent pte entries. In order to
>> + * ensure the contpte range is covered by a single folio, we must
>> + * recover the folio from the pfn, but special mappings don't have a
>> + * folio backing them. Fortunately contpte_try_fold() already checked
>> + * that the pte is not special - we never try to fold special mappings.
>> + * Note we can't use vm_normal_page() for this since we don't have the
>> + * vma.
>> + */
>> +
>> + unsigned long folio_saddr;
>> + unsigned long folio_eaddr;
>> + unsigned long cont_saddr;
>> + unsigned long cont_eaddr;
>> + struct folio *folio;
>> + struct page *page;
>> + unsigned long pfn;
>> + pte_t *orig_ptep;
>> + pgprot_t prot;
>> + pte_t subpte;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + if (!mm_is_user(mm))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + page = pte_page(pte);
>> + folio = page_folio(page);
>> + folio_saddr = addr - (page - &folio->page) * PAGE_SIZE;
>> + folio_eaddr = folio_saddr + folio_nr_pages(folio) * PAGE_SIZE;
>> + cont_saddr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, CONT_PTE_SIZE);
>> + cont_eaddr = cont_saddr + CONT_PTE_SIZE;
>> +
>> + if (folio_saddr > cont_saddr || folio_eaddr < cont_eaddr)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + pfn = pte_pfn(pte) - ((addr - cont_saddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> + prot = pte_pgprot(pte_mkold(pte_mkclean(pte)));
>> + orig_ptep = ptep;
>> + ptep = contpte_align_down(ptep);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < CONT_PTES; i++, ptep++, pfn++) {
>> + subpte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>> + subpte = pte_mkold(pte_mkclean(subpte));
>> +
>> + if (!pte_valid(subpte) ||
>> + pte_pfn(subpte) != pfn ||
>> + pgprot_val(pte_pgprot(subpte)) != pgprot_val(prot))
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pte = pte_mkcont(pte);
>> + contpte_convert(mm, addr, orig_ptep, pte);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__contpte_try_fold);
>> +
>> +void __contpte_try_unfold(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * We have already checked that the ptes are contiguous in
>> + * contpte_try_unfold(), so just check that the mm is user space.
>> + */
>> +
>> + if (!mm_is_user(mm))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + pte = pte_mknoncont(pte);
>> + contpte_convert(mm, addr, ptep, pte);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__contpte_try_unfold);
>> +
>> +pte_t contpte_ptep_get(pte_t *ptep, pte_t orig_pte)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Gather access/dirty bits, which may be populated in any of the ptes
>> + * of the contig range. We are guarranteed to be holding the PTL, so any
>> + * contiguous range cannot be unfolded or otherwise modified under our
>> + * feet.
>> + */
>> +
>> + pte_t pte;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + ptep = contpte_align_down(ptep);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < CONT_PTES; i++, ptep++) {
>> + pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>> +
>> + if (pte_dirty(pte))
>> + orig_pte = pte_mkdirty(orig_pte);
>> +
>> + if (pte_young(pte))
>> + orig_pte = pte_mkyoung(orig_pte);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return orig_pte;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(contpte_ptep_get);
>> +
>> +pte_t contpte_ptep_get_lockless(pte_t *orig_ptep)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Gather access/dirty bits, which may be populated in any of the ptes
>> + * of the contig range. We may not be holding the PTL, so any contiguous
>> + * range may be unfolded/modified/refolded under our feet. Therefore we
>> + * ensure we read a _consistent_ contpte range by checking that all ptes
>> + * in the range are valid and have CONT_PTE set, that all pfns are
>> + * contiguous and that all pgprots are the same (ignoring access/dirty).
>> + * If we find a pte that is not consistent, then we must be racing with
>> + * an update so start again. If the target pte does not have CONT_PTE
>> + * set then that is considered consistent on its own because it is not
>> + * part of a contpte range.
>> + */
>> +
>> + pgprot_t orig_prot;
>> + unsigned long pfn;
>> + pte_t orig_pte;
>> + pgprot_t prot;
>> + pte_t *ptep;
>> + pte_t pte;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> +retry:
>> + orig_pte = __ptep_get(orig_ptep);
>> +
>> + if (!pte_valid_cont(orig_pte))
>> + return orig_pte;
>> +
>> + orig_prot = pte_pgprot(pte_mkold(pte_mkclean(orig_pte)));
>> + ptep = contpte_align_down(orig_ptep);
>> + pfn = pte_pfn(orig_pte) - (orig_ptep - ptep);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < CONT_PTES; i++, ptep++, pfn++) {
>> + pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>> + prot = pte_pgprot(pte_mkold(pte_mkclean(pte)));
>> +
>> + if (!pte_valid_cont(pte) ||
>> + pte_pfn(pte) != pfn ||
>> + pgprot_val(prot) != pgprot_val(orig_prot))
>> + goto retry;
>> +
>> + if (pte_dirty(pte))
>> + orig_pte = pte_mkdirty(orig_pte);
>> +
>> + if (pte_young(pte))
>> + orig_pte = pte_mkyoung(orig_pte);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return orig_pte;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(contpte_ptep_get_lockless);
>> +
>> +void contpte_set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> + pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long next;
>> + unsigned long end;
>> + unsigned long pfn;
>> + pgprot_t prot;
>> + pte_t orig_pte;
>> +
>> + if (!mm_is_user(mm))
>> + return __set_ptes(mm, addr, ptep, pte, nr);
>> +
>> + end = addr + (nr << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> + pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
>> + prot = pte_pgprot(pte);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + next = pte_cont_addr_end(addr, end);
>> + nr = (next - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
>> +
>> + if (((addr | next | (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT)) & ~CONT_PTE_MASK) == 0)
>> + pte = pte_mkcont(pte);
>> + else
>> + pte = pte_mknoncont(pte);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If operating on a partial contiguous range then we must first
>> + * unfold the contiguous range if it was previously folded.
>> + * Otherwise we could end up with overlapping tlb entries.
>> + */
>> + if (nr != CONT_PTES)
>> + contpte_try_unfold(mm, addr, ptep, __ptep_get(ptep));
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If we are replacing ptes that were contiguous or if the new
>> + * ptes are contiguous and any of the ptes being replaced are
>> + * valid, we need to clear and flush the range to prevent
>> + * overlapping tlb entries.
>> + */
>> + orig_pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>> + if (pte_valid_cont(orig_pte) ||
>> + (pte_cont(pte) && ptep_any_valid(ptep, nr)))
>> + ptep_clear_flush_range(mm, addr, ptep, nr);
>> +
>> + __set_ptes(mm, addr, ptep, pte, nr);
>> +
>> + addr = next;
>> + ptep += nr;
>> + pfn += nr;
>> +
>> + } while (addr != end);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(contpte_set_ptes);
>> +
>> +int contpte_ptep_test_and_clear_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * ptep_clear_flush_young() technically requires us to clear the access
>> + * flag for a _single_ pte. However, the core-mm code actually tracks
>> + * access/dirty per folio, not per page. And since we only create a
>> + * contig range when the range is covered by a single folio, we can get
>> + * away with clearing young for the whole contig range here, so we avoid
>> + * having to unfold.
>> + */
>> +
>> + int young = 0;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + ptep = contpte_align_down(ptep);
>> + addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, CONT_PTE_SIZE);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < CONT_PTES; i++, ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE)
>> + young |= __ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, addr, ptep);
>> +
>> + return young;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(contpte_ptep_test_and_clear_young);
>> +
>> +int contpte_ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>> +{
>> + int young;
>> +
>> + young = contpte_ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, addr, ptep);
>> +
>> + if (young) {
>> + /*
>> + * See comment in __ptep_clear_flush_young(); same rationale for
>> + * eliding the trailing DSB applies here.
>> + */
>> + addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, CONT_PTE_SIZE);
>> + __flush_tlb_range_nosync(vma, addr, addr + CONT_PTE_SIZE,
>> + PAGE_SIZE, true, 3);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return young;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(contpte_ptep_clear_flush_young);
>> +
>> +int contpte_ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>> + pte_t entry, int dirty)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long start_addr;
>> + pte_t orig_pte;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Gather the access/dirty bits for the contiguous range. If nothing has
>> + * changed, its a noop.
>> + */
>> + orig_pte = pte_mknoncont(ptep_get(ptep));
>> + if (pte_val(orig_pte) == pte_val(entry))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We can fix up access/dirty bits without having to unfold/fold the
>> + * contig range. But if the write bit is changing, we need to go through
>> + * the full unfold/fold cycle.
>> + */
>> + if (pte_write(orig_pte) == pte_write(entry)) {
>> + /*
>> + * For HW access management, we technically only need to update
>> + * the flag on a single pte in the range. But for SW access
>> + * management, we need to update all the ptes to prevent extra
>> + * faults. Avoid per-page tlb flush in __ptep_set_access_flags()
>> + * and instead flush the whole range at the end.
>> + */
>> + ptep = contpte_align_down(ptep);
>> + start_addr = addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, CONT_PTE_SIZE);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < CONT_PTES; i++, ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE)
>> + __ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr, ptep, entry, 0);
>
>
> entry was pte_mknoncont() in ptep_set_access_flags() so here you lose the
> contpte range, is that intentional? Or am I mistaken?
entry doesn't have PTE_CONT bit set, that's correct. I intentionally strip that
bit at the interface boundary, because it is the implementation's job to decide
whether its a contpte block, not the caller's. But there are situations where
the caller can end up with a pte that has PTE_CONT set (by having done a
previous ptep_get() for example) and then it forwards the pte to a setter. So
stripping it is required; It would probably be cleaner to strip it before
returning it from ptep_get(), but that would be problematic for pte_leaf_size()
which is called from perf_get_pgtable_size().
In this particular case, __ptep_set_access_flags() only modifies the PTE's
access flags, so CONT_PTE will remain as it is in the page table. The fact that
entry has it cleared is not a problem.
Thanks,
Ryan
>
>
>> +
>> + if (dirty)
>> + __flush_tlb_range(vma, start_addr, addr,
>> + PAGE_SIZE, true, 3);
>> + } else {
>> + __contpte_try_unfold(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, orig_pte);
>> + __ptep_set_access_flags(vma, addr, ptep, entry, dirty);
>> + contpte_try_fold(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, entry);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 1;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(contpte_ptep_set_access_flags);