Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: sophgo: Add clock controller of SG2000 series SoC

[Inochi Amaoto]

>On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:27:59AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 12:16:58PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
>>>> SG2000 series SoC has the same clock as CV1810 series, but the clock
>>>> related to A53 is functional in SG2000 series. So a new compatible
>>>> string is needed for the new SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Add definition for the clock controller of the SG2000 series SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Link: https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc/releases/tag/sg2000-datasheet-v1.0-alpha
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml | 3 ++-
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
>>>> index c1dc24673c0d..59ef41adb539 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml
>>>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>>>>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sophgo,cv1800-clk.yaml#
>>>>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>>
>>>> -title: Sophgo CV1800 Series Clock Controller
>>>> +title: Sophgo CV1800/SG2000 Series Clock Controller
>>>>
>>>>  maintainers:
>>>>    - Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties:
>>>>      enum:
>>>>        - sophgo,cv1800-clk
>>>>        - sophgo,cv1810-clk
>>>> +      - sophgo,sg2000-clk
>>>
>>> I recall before you mentioned that the Sophgo folks were considering
>>> renaming one of their devices. Is the sg2000 the renamed one, or a
>>> different chip?
>
>> The sg2000/sg2002 SoCs have one A53 core which cv1812/cv1813 SoCs
>> don't have. I prefer sg2000/sg2002 are different chips, or at least
>> an enhanced version of existed cv1812/cv1813. It is not a simple
>> rename.
>>
>> For this patch, the sg2000 doesn't need to disable A53 related clocks
>> like cv18xx series. So this compatible is needed to bind to this new
>> logic.
>
>I'm not disputing the unique compatible - you previously mentioned that
>Sophgo were considering rebranding the cvXXXX series of chips going
>forward and that one particular chip might undergo a name change.
>I was wondering if this was that chip or just another device in the
>series.
>
>Thanks,
>Conor.

For your question, this is the rename chip I mentioned.

This is the name mapping I have known:
cv1812cp -> sg2000
cv1813h -> sg2002