Re: [PATCH 13/20] filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core

[NeilBrown]

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking
> functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct
> file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/locks.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> 


>  
>  /* Must be called with the blocked_lock_lock held! */
> -static int posix_locks_deadlock(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
> -				struct file_lock *block_fl)
> +static bool posix_locks_deadlock(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
> +				 struct file_lock *block_fl)
>  {
> +	struct file_lock_core *caller = &caller_fl->fl_core;
> +	struct file_lock_core *blocker = &block_fl->fl_core;
>  	int i = 0;
> -	struct file_lock_core *flc = &caller_fl->fl_core;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&blocked_lock_lock);
>  
> @@ -1034,16 +1040,16 @@ static int posix_locks_deadlock(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
>  	 * This deadlock detector can't reasonably detect deadlocks with
>  	 * FL_OFDLCK locks, since they aren't owned by a process, per-se.
>  	 */
> -	if (IS_OFDLCK(flc))
> +	if (IS_OFDLCK(caller))
>  		return 0;

      return false;

Thanks,
NeilBrown