Re: [RFC 4/7] soc: qcom: Utilize qcom scmi vendor protocol for bus dvfs

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 1/17/24 18:34, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> From: Shivnandan Kumar <quic_kshivnan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch introduces a client driver that interacts with the SCMI QCOM
> vendor protocol and passes on the required tuneables to start various
> features running on the SCMI controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shivnandan Kumar <quic_kshivnan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Ramakrishna Gottimukkula <quic_rgottimu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ramakrishna Gottimukkula <quic_rgottimu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Amir Vajid <avajid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Vajid <avajid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Co-developed-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

[...]


> +
> +struct cpufreq_memfreq_map {
> +	unsigned int			cpufreq_mhz;
> +	unsigned int			memfreq_khz;
> +};

Weird use of tabs

[...]

> +static int get_mask(struct device_node *np, u32 *mask)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *dev_phandle;
> +	struct device *cpu_dev;
> +	int cpu, i = 0;
> +	int ret = -ENODEV;

Don't initialize ret here, return 0 instead of breaking and return
enodev otherwise.

> +
> +	dev_phandle = of_parse_phandle(np, "qcom,cpulist", i++);
> +	while (dev_phandle) {
> +		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +			cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> +			if (cpu_dev && cpu_dev->of_node == dev_phandle) {
> +				*mask |= BIT(cpu);
> +				ret = 0;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}

of_cpu_node_to_id()

> +		dev_phandle = of_parse_phandle(np, "qcom,cpulist", i++);
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}


> +
> +static struct cpufreq_memfreq_map *init_cpufreq_memfreq_map(struct device *dev,
> +							    struct device_node *of_node,
> +							    u32 *cnt)

I really feel like this is trying to reinvent OPP..

if you structure your entries like so:

opp-0 {
	opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <12341234 43214321>;
};

you'll be able to use all the fantastic APIs that have been
created over the years!

[...]

> +			monitor->mon_type = (of_property_read_bool(monitor_np, "qcom,compute-mon")) ? 1 : 0;
> +			monitor->ipm_ceil = (of_property_read_bool(monitor_np, "qcom,compute-mon")) ? 0 : 20000000;

What does it even mean for a monitor to be a compute mon?

There seem to be no dt-bindings for properties referenced in this
driver, neither in the series nor in the dependencies. This is
strictly required.

Konrad