[syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in vfs_removexattr (2)

From: syzbot
Date: Mon Jan 22 2024 - 05:30:39 EST

Next message: Simon Horman: "Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 7/9] ethtool: cmis_cdb: Add a layer for supporting CDB commands"
Previous message: Damien Le Moal: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] ata: ahci_ceva: add missing enable regulator API for Xilinx GT PHY support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 0802e17d9aca Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10379b1be80000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f9616b7e180577ba
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7ecfa4360b4449cf2a01
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
userspace arch: arm64

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e84e45f27a78/disk-0802e17d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a8b16d2fc3b1/vmlinux-0802e17d.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4c7ac36b3de1/Image-0802e17d.gz.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+7ecfa4360b4449cf2a01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

REISERFS (device loop1): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.7.0-rc8-syzkaller-g0802e17d9aca #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.1/16589 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff00012c9b82e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline]
ffff00012c9b82e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vfs_removexattr+0xcc/0x23c fs/xattr.c:575

but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000ce5fe418 (sb_writers#28){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x44/0x9c fs/namespace.c:404

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (sb_writers#28){.+.+}-{0:0}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1635 [inline]
sb_start_write+0x60/0x2ec include/linux/fs.h:1710
mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:448
reiserfs_ioctl+0x188/0x42c fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:857 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:857
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51
el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155
el0_svc+0x54/0x158 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595

-> #1 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27
reiserfs_lookup+0x128/0x45c fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364
__lookup_slow+0x250/0x374 fs/namei.c:1694
lookup_one_len+0x178/0x28c fs/namei.c:2746
reiserfs_lookup_privroot+0x8c/0x184 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:977
reiserfs_fill_super+0x15b4/0x2028 fs/reiserfs/super.c:2192
mount_bdev+0x1e8/0x2b4 fs/super.c:1650
get_super_block+0x44/0x58 fs/reiserfs/super.c:2601
legacy_get_tree+0xd4/0x16c fs/fs_context.c:662
vfs_get_tree+0x90/0x288 fs/super.c:1771
do_new_mount+0x25c/0x8c8 fs/namespace.c:3337
path_mount+0x590/0xe04 fs/namespace.c:3664
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3677 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3886 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3863 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mount+0x45c/0x594 fs/namespace.c:3863
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51
el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155
el0_svc+0x54/0x158 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595

-> #0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x3384/0x763c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
down_write+0x50/0xc0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1579
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline]
vfs_removexattr+0xcc/0x23c fs/xattr.c:575
removexattr+0x148/0x1c4 fs/xattr.c:918
path_removexattr+0x160/0x23c fs/xattr.c:932
__do_sys_removexattr fs/xattr.c:946 [inline]
__se_sys_removexattr fs/xattr.c:943 [inline]
__arm64_sys_removexattr+0x60/0x78 fs/xattr.c:943
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51
el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155
el0_svc+0x54/0x158 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
&type->i_mutex_dir_key#15 --> &sbi->lock --> sb_writers#28

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
rlock(sb_writers#28);
lock(&sbi->lock);
lock(sb_writers#28);
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#15);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.1/16589:
#0: ffff0000ce5fe418 (sb_writers#28){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x44/0x9c fs/namespace.c:404

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 16589 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc8-syzkaller-g0802e17d9aca #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/17/2023
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x1b8/0x1e4 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:291
show_stack+0x2c/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:298
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd0/0x124 lib/dump_stack.c:106
dump_stack+0x1c/0x28 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_circular_bug+0x150/0x1b8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2060
check_noncircular+0x310/0x404 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x3384/0x763c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
down_write+0x50/0xc0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1579
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline]
vfs_removexattr+0xcc/0x23c fs/xattr.c:575
removexattr+0x148/0x1c4 fs/xattr.c:918
path_removexattr+0x160/0x23c fs/xattr.c:932
__do_sys_removexattr fs/xattr.c:946 [inline]
__se_sys_removexattr fs/xattr.c:943 [inline]
__arm64_sys_removexattr+0x60/0x78 fs/xattr.c:943
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51
el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155
el0_svc+0x54/0x158 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Next message: Simon Horman: "Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 7/9] ethtool: cmis_cdb: Add a layer for supporting CDB commands"
Previous message: Damien Le Moal: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] ata: ahci_ceva: add missing enable regulator API for Xilinx GT PHY support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]