Re: RE: [PATCH 00/45] C++: Convert the kernel to C++

[Jiri Slaby]

On 11. 01. 24, 20:40, David Laight wrote:
> I've seen the same issue with some C++ code that was like:
> (Pardon my C++ :-)
> 	foo = new();
> 	try {
> 		add_foo_to_list(foo);



> 	} except {
> 		free(foo);
> 	}
> The problem is that you have no idea whether the exception was
> thrown before or after 'foo' was saved.
> Since pretty much everything can 'throw' you really can't tell.

I don't follow, you can catch() specific (e.g. ENotAdded) exceptions.

> OTOH if add_foo_to_list() returns an error code you can know
> (and check) that zero is returned iff the pointer has been saved.

There is no difference between throwing exceptions (you can as well 
embed an error code in a generic exception, if you want) and throwing 
error numbers directly.

A different question is whether we want exceptions (RTTI) in the kernel 
at all. Not sure about gcc, but for example LLVM does not.

regards,
--
js
suse labs