Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-mcu/wakeup: Disable MCU and wakeup R5FSS nodes

From: Vaishnav Achath
Date: Thu Jan 25 2024 - 00:47:42 EST


Hi Nishanth,

On 24/01/24 22:51, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 11:26-20240124, Jayesh Choudhary wrote:
Hello Vaishnav,

On 21/01/24 19:10, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
K3 Remoteproc R5 driver requires reserved memory carveouts and
mailbox configuration to instantiate the cores successfully.
Since this is a board level dependency, keep the R5 subsytem
disabled at SoC dtsi, otherwise it results in probe errors like
below during AM62P SK boot:

r5fss@79000000: reserved memory init failed, ret = -22
r5fss@79000000: k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = -22
r5fss@78000000: reserved memory init failed, ret = -22
r5fss@78000000: k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = -22

Fixes: b5080c7c1f7e ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: Add nodes for more IPs")

Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@xxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@xxxxxx>

---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi | 2 ++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
index c4b0b91d70cf..14eb9ba836d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
@@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ mcu_r5fss0: r5fss@79000000 {
ranges = <0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x8000>,
<0x79020000 0x00 0x79020000 0x8000>;
power-domains = <&k3_pds 7 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
+ status = "disabled";
+
mcu_r5fss0_core0: r5f@79000000 {
compatible = "ti,am62-r5f";
reg = <0x79000000 0x00008000>,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
index 19f42b39394e..10a7059b2d9b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ wkup_r5fss0: r5fss@78000000 {
ranges = <0x78000000 0x00 0x78000000 0x8000>,
<0x78100000 0x00 0x78100000 0x8000>;
power-domains = <&k3_pds 119 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
+ status = "disabled";

Is there a reason for difference in white space addition?


For mcu_r5fss0_core0 child node there was no blank line as per the recommended coding style : https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst#n124

So I added a newline there and wkup_r5fss0 already had it correct, since the change was trivial it was not mentioned in commit message.

Thanks and Regards,
Vaishnav

wkup_r5fss0_core0: r5f@78000000 {
compatible = "ti,am62-r5f";

Thanks.