Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] iio: hid-sensor-als: Assign channels dynamically
From: Srinivas Pandruvada
Date: Thu Jan 25 2024 - 01:02:03 EST
Hi Basavraj,
On 1/24/24 21:51, Basavaraj Natikar wrote:
Hi Srinivas,
On 1/9/2024 11:30 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
Instead of assuming that every channel defined statically by
als_channels[] is present, assign dynamically based on presence of the
respective usage id in the descriptor. This will allow to register ALS
with limited channel support. Append the timestamp as the last channel.
When not all usage ids are present, the scan index is adjusted to
exclude unsupported channels.
There is no intentional function changes done.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v3:
Addressed comments from Jonthan:
- Remove channel allocation and move to iio_priv()
- Parse all usage IDs in a single loop and continue
for failure. This way the temperature and chromaticity
will not need any special processing to parse usage ids.
- Don't leave empty channel indexes
v2:
New change
drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
index 5cd27f04b45e..72a7c01c97f8 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
@@ -25,17 +25,26 @@ struct als_state {
struct hid_sensor_hub_callbacks callbacks;
struct hid_sensor_common common_attributes;
struct hid_sensor_hub_attribute_info als[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_MAX];
+ struct iio_chan_spec channels[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_MAX + 1];
struct {
u32 illum[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_MAX];
+ u32 scan_index[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_MAX];
u64 timestamp __aligned(8);
} scan;
int scale_pre_decml;
int scale_post_decml;
int scale_precision;
int value_offset;
+ int num_channels;
s64 timestamp;
};
+/* The order of usage ids must match scan index starting from CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_INTENSITY */
+static const u32 als_usage_ids[] = {
+ HID_USAGE_SENSOR_LIGHT_ILLUM,
+ HID_USAGE_SENSOR_LIGHT_ILLUM,
+};
+
static const u32 als_sensitivity_addresses[] = {
HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DATA_LIGHT,
HID_USAGE_SENSOR_LIGHT_ILLUM,
@@ -216,11 +225,14 @@ static int als_capture_sample(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
struct als_state *als_state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
int ret = -EINVAL;
u32 sample_data = *(u32 *)raw_data;
+ int scan_index;
switch (usage_id) {
case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_LIGHT_ILLUM:
- als_state->scan.illum[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_INTENSITY] = sample_data;
- als_state->scan.illum[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_ILLUM] = sample_data;
+ scan_index = als_state->scan.scan_index[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_INTENSITY];
+ als_state->scan.illum[scan_index] = sample_data;
+ scan_index = als_state->scan.scan_index[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_ILLUM];
+ als_state->scan.illum[scan_index] = sample_data;
Could you please use original above change which works fine for some reason if
we use this change als_state->scan.scan_index we are getting garbage value.
I think this is because of the issue which you found later for this patch.
ret = 0;
break;
case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_TIME_TIMESTAMP:
@@ -237,27 +249,39 @@ static int als_capture_sample(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
/* Parse report which is specific to an usage id*/
static int als_parse_report(struct platform_device *pdev,
struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
- struct iio_chan_spec *channels,
unsigned usage_id,
struct als_state *st)
{
- int ret;
+ struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
+ int ret, index = 0;
int i;
+ channels = st->channels;
+
for (i = 0; i <= CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_ILLUM; ++i) {
Could you please change CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_ILLUM to CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_MAX
which helps remaining 2 patches in the series.
Makes sense.
Thanks,
Srinivas
ret = sensor_hub_input_get_attribute_info(hsdev,
HID_INPUT_REPORT,
usage_id,
- HID_USAGE_SENSOR_LIGHT_ILLUM,
+ als_usage_ids[i],
&st->als[i]);
if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
- als_adjust_channel_bit_mask(channels, i, st->als[i].size);
+ continue;
+
+ channels[index] = als_channels[i];
+ st->scan.scan_index[i] = index;
+
+ als_adjust_channel_bit_mask(channels, index, st->als[i].size);
+ ++index;
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "als %x:%x\n", st->als[i].index,
st->als[i].report_id);
}
+ st->num_channels = index;
+ /* Return success even if one usage id is present */
+ if (index)
+ ret = 0;
+
st->scale_precision = hid_sensor_format_scale(usage_id,
&st->als[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_INTENSITY],
&st->scale_pre_decml, &st->scale_post_decml);
@@ -293,15 +317,7 @@ static int hid_als_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
- indio_dev->channels = devm_kmemdup(&pdev->dev, als_channels,
- sizeof(als_channels), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!indio_dev->channels) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to duplicate channels\n");
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
ret = als_parse_report(pdev, hsdev,
- (struct iio_chan_spec *)indio_dev->channels,
hsdev->usage,
als_state);
if (ret) {
@@ -309,8 +325,14 @@ static int hid_als_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
- indio_dev->num_channels =
- ARRAY_SIZE(als_channels);
+ /* Add timestamp channel */
+ als_state->channels[als_state->num_channels] = als_channels[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_TIMESTAMP];
+ als_state->channels[als_state->num_channels].scan_index = als_state->num_channels;
+
+ /* +1 for adding timestamp channel */
+ indio_dev->num_channels = als_state->num_channels + 1;
+
+ indio_dev->channels = als_state->channels;
indio_dev->info = &als_info;
indio_dev->name = name;
indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;