Re: [PATCH 02/15] tick/nohz: Remove duplicate between lowres and highres handlers

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, Jan 25 2024 at 12:58, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:32:09AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24 2024 at 18:04, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> > +/*
>> > + * We rearm the timer until we get disabled by the idle code.
>> > + * Called with interrupts disabled.
>> > + */
>> > +static enum hrtimer_restart tick_nohz_highres_handler(struct hrtimer *timer)
>> 
>> Isn't that a misnomer now?
>
> Would tick_nohz_hrtimer_handler() make more sense then? Because it's clearly
> an hrtimer handler, just emulated in low-res mode.

Kinda. tick_nohz_handler() would be sufficient too.