Re: [PATCH V4 0/7] Clean up perf mem

[Namhyung Kim]

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 9:24 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:24 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:51 AM <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Changes since V3:
> > > - Fix the powerPC building error (Kajol Jain)
> > > - The s390 does not support perf mem. Remove the code. (Thomas)
> > > - Add reviewed-by and tested-by from Kajol Jain for patch 1 and 2
> > > - Add tested-by from Leo
> > >
> > > Changes since V2:
> > > - Fix the Arm64 building error (Leo)
> > > - Add two new patches to clean up perf_mem_events__record_args()
> > >   and perf_pmus__num_mem_pmus() (Leo)
> > >
> > > Changes since V1:
> > > - Fix strcmp of PMU name checking (Ravi)
> > > - Fix "/," typo (Ian)
> > > - Rename several functions with perf_pmu__mem_events prefix. (Ian)
> > > - Fold the header removal patch into the patch where the cleanups made.
> > >   (Arnaldo)
> > > - Add reviewed-by and tested-by from Ian and Ravi
> > >
> > > As discussed in the below thread, the patch set is to clean up perf mem.
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/afefab15-cffc-4345-9cf4-c6a4128d4d9c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > > Introduce generic functions perf_mem_events__ptr(),
> > > perf_mem_events__name() ,and is_mem_loads_aux_event() to replace the
> > > ARCH specific ones.
> > > Simplify the perf_mem_event__supported().
> > >
> > > Only keeps the ARCH-specific perf_mem_events array in the corresponding
> > > mem-events.c for each ARCH.
> > >
> > > There is no functional change.
> > >
> > > The patch set touches almost all the ARCHs, Intel, AMD, ARM, Power and
> > > etc. But I can only test it on two Intel platforms.
> > > Please give it try, if you have machines with other ARCHs.
> > >
> > > Here are the test results:
> > > Intel hybrid machine:
> > >
> > > $perf mem record -e list
> > > ldlat-loads  : available
> > > ldlat-stores : available
> > >
> > > $perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
> > > calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P
> > >
> > > $perf mem record -v
> > > calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P
> > >
> > > $perf mem record -t store -v
> > > calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P
> > >
> > >
> > > Intel SPR:
> > > $perf mem record -e list
> > > ldlat-loads  : available
> > > ldlat-stores : available
> > >
> > > $perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
> > > calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=50/}:P
> > >
> > > $perf mem record -v
> > > calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}:P -e cpu/mem-stores/P
> > >
> > > $perf mem record -t store -v
> > > calling: record -e cpu/mem-stores/P
> > >
> > > Kan Liang (7):
> > >   perf mem: Add mem_events into the supported perf_pmu
> > >   perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__ptr()
> > >   perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__name()
> > >   perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_event__supported()
> > >   perf mem: Clean up is_mem_loads_aux_event()
> > >   perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__record_args()
> > >   perf mem: Clean up perf_pmus__num_mem_pmus()
> >
> > I think this is ready to land in perf-tools-next, multiple Tested-by
> > or Reviewed-by.
>
> Sure, queued for a local testing.

Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!

Namhyung