Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: mailbox: fsl,mu: add i.MX95 Generic/ELE/V2X MU compatible
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Fri Jan 26 2024 - 11:32:55 EST
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 02:29:14PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> examples:
> @@ -134,3 +159,34 @@ examples:
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 176 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> #mbox-cells = <2>;
> };
> +
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +
> + mu2: mailbox@445b0000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu";
> + reg = <0x445b0000 0x10000>;
> + ranges;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 226 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + #mbox-cells = <2>;
> +
> + sram@445b1000 {
> + compatible = "mmio-sram";
> + reg = <0x445b1000 0x400>;
> + ranges = <0x0 0x445b1000 0x400>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> + scmi_buf0: scmi-sram-section@0 {
If you are resending, the labels here for the section nodes are not used
and should be dropped. Ditto the "mu2" label above.
Otherwise, this looks okay to me.
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Conor.
> + compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem";
> + reg = <0x0 0x80>;
> + };
> +
> + scmi_buf1: scmi-sram-section@80 {
> + compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem";
> + reg = <0x80 0x80>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
>
> --
> 2.37.1
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature