[PATCH 4/4] af_unix: convert to lock_cmp_fn
From: Kent Overstreet
Date: Fri Jan 26 2024 - 21:16:09 EST
Kill
- unix_state_lock_nested
- _nested usage for net->unx.table.locks[].
replace both with lock_set_cmp_fn_ptr_order(&u->lock).
The lock ordering in sk_diag_dump_icons() looks suspicious; this may
turn up a real issue.
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/net/af_unix.h | 3 ---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 20 ++++++++------------
net/unix/diag.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h
index 49c4640027d8..4eff0a089640 100644
--- a/include/net/af_unix.h
+++ b/include/net/af_unix.h
@@ -48,9 +48,6 @@ struct scm_stat {
#define unix_state_lock(s) spin_lock(&unix_sk(s)->lock)
#define unix_state_unlock(s) spin_unlock(&unix_sk(s)->lock)
-#define unix_state_lock_nested(s) \
- spin_lock_nested(&unix_sk(s)->lock, \
- SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING)
/* The AF_UNIX socket */
struct unix_sock {
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index d013de3c5490..1a0d273799c1 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void unix_table_double_lock(struct net *net,
swap(hash1, hash2);
spin_lock(&net->unx.table.locks[hash1]);
- spin_lock_nested(&net->unx.table.locks[hash2], SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+ spin_lock(&net->unx.table.locks[hash2]);
}
static void unix_table_double_unlock(struct net *net,
@@ -997,6 +997,7 @@ static struct sock *unix_create1(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int kern,
u->path.dentry = NULL;
u->path.mnt = NULL;
spin_lock_init(&u->lock);
+ lock_set_cmp_fn_ptr_order(&u->lock);
atomic_long_set(&u->inflight, 0);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&u->link);
mutex_init(&u->iolock); /* single task reading lock */
@@ -1340,17 +1341,11 @@ static int unix_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
static void unix_state_double_lock(struct sock *sk1, struct sock *sk2)
{
- if (unlikely(sk1 == sk2) || !sk2) {
- unix_state_lock(sk1);
- return;
- }
- if (sk1 < sk2) {
+ if (sk1 > sk2)
+ swap(sk1, sk2);
+ if (sk1 && sk1 != sk2)
unix_state_lock(sk1);
- unix_state_lock_nested(sk2);
- } else {
- unix_state_lock(sk2);
- unix_state_lock_nested(sk1);
- }
+ unix_state_lock(sk2);
}
static void unix_state_double_unlock(struct sock *sk1, struct sock *sk2)
@@ -1591,7 +1586,7 @@ static int unix_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
goto out_unlock;
}
- unix_state_lock_nested(sk);
+ unix_state_lock(sk);
if (sk->sk_state != st) {
unix_state_unlock(sk);
@@ -3575,6 +3570,7 @@ static int __net_init unix_net_init(struct net *net)
for (i = 0; i < UNIX_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
spin_lock_init(&net->unx.table.locks[i]);
+ lock_set_cmp_fn_ptr_order(&net->unx.table.locks[i]);
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&net->unx.table.buckets[i]);
}
diff --git a/net/unix/diag.c b/net/unix/diag.c
index bec09a3a1d44..8ab5e2217e4c 100644
--- a/net/unix/diag.c
+++ b/net/unix/diag.c
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int sk_diag_dump_icons(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *nlskb)
* queue lock. With the other's queue locked it's
* OK to lock the state.
*/
- unix_state_lock_nested(req);
+ unix_state_lock(req);
peer = unix_sk(req)->peer;
buf[i++] = (peer ? sock_i_ino(peer) : 0);
unix_state_unlock(req);
--
2.43.0