Re: [PATCH v11 05/26] dept: Tie to Lockdep and IRQ tracing

From: kernel test robot
Date: Sun Jan 28 2024 - 10:59:52 EST

Hi Byungchul,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on 0dd3ee31125508cd67f7e7172247f05b7fd1753a]

url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Byungchul-Park/llist-Move-llist_-head-node-definition-to-types-h/20240124-200243
base: 0dd3ee31125508cd67f7e7172247f05b7fd1753a
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240124115938.80132-6-byungchul%40sk.com
patch subject: [PATCH v11 05/26] dept: Tie to Lockdep and IRQ tracing
config: microblaze-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240128/202401282340.oDsdGzj2-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: microblaze-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240128/202401282340.oDsdGzj2-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401282340.oDsdGzj2-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:7000:
fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c: In function 'test_new_blocks_simple':
>> fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c:298:1: warning: the frame size of 1120 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
298 | }
| ^
--
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c:3598:
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c: In function 'vcap_api_next_lookup_advanced_test':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c:2001:1: warning: the frame size of 1260 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
2001 | }
| ^


vim +298 fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c

7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 245
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 246 static void test_new_blocks_simple(struct kunit *test)
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 247 {
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 248 struct super_block *sb = (struct super_block *)test->priv;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 249 struct inode inode = { .i_sb = sb, };
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 250 struct ext4_allocation_request ar;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 251 ext4_group_t i, goal_group = TEST_GOAL_GROUP;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 252 int err = 0;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 253 ext4_fsblk_t found;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 254 struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 255
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 256 ar.inode = &inode;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 257
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 258 /* get block at goal */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 259 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 260 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 261 KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ar.goal, found,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 262 "failed to alloc block at goal, expected %llu found %llu",
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 263 ar.goal, found);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 264
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 265 /* get block after goal in goal group */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 266 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 267 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 268 KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ar.goal + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1), found,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 269 "failed to alloc block after goal in goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 270 ar.goal + 1, found);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 271
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 272 /* get block after goal group */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 273 mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, goal_group, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 274 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 275 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 276 KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 277 ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group + 1), found,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 278 "failed to alloc block after goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 279 ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group + 1), found);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 280
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 281 /* get block before goal group */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 282 for (i = goal_group; i < ext4_get_groups_count(sb); i++)
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 283 mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, i, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 284 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 285 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 286 KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 287 ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, 0) + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1), found,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 288 "failed to alloc block before goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 289 ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, 0 + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1)), found);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 290
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 291 /* no block available, fail to allocate block */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 292 for (i = 0; i < ext4_get_groups_count(sb); i++)
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 293 mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, i, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 294 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 295 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 296 KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, err, 0,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 297 "unexpectedly get block when no block is available");
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 @298 }
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 299

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki