Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] phy: qcom: edp: Add set_mode op for configuring eDP/DP submode

From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Mon Jan 29 2024 - 04:40:49 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "drivers/of/unittest.c:573:43: error: 'struct device_node' has no member named 'kobj'"
Previous message: David Laight: "RE: [PATCH 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Implement ssprintf() to catch truncated strings"
In reply to: Abel Vesa: "Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] phy: qcom: edp: Add set_mode op for configuring eDP/DP submode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 10:06, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 24-01-29 06:05:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 02:26, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Future platforms should not use different compatibles to differentiate
> > > between eDP and DP mode. Instead, they should use a single compatible as the
> > > IP block is the same. It will be the job of the controller to set the submode
> > > of the PHY accordingly.
> > >
> > > The existing platforms will remain with separate compatibles for each mode.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> > > index 8e5078304646..af941d6c5588 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/module.h>
> > > #include <linux/of.h>
> > > #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> > > +#include <linux/phy/phy-dp.h>
> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > > #include <linux/reset.h>
> > > @@ -68,19 +69,21 @@
> > >
> > > #define TXn_TRAN_DRVR_EMP_EN 0x0078
> > >
> > > -struct qcom_edp_cfg {
> > > - bool is_dp;
> > > -
> > > - /* DP PHY swing and pre_emphasis tables */
> > > +struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg {
> > > const u8 (*swing_hbr_rbr)[4][4];
> > > const u8 (*swing_hbr3_hbr2)[4][4];
> > > const u8 (*pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr)[4][4];
> > > const u8 (*pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2)[4][4];
> > > };
> > >
> > > +struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg {
> > > + bool is_edp;
> > > + const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg *swing_pre_emph_cfg;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > struct qcom_edp {
> > > struct device *dev;
> > > - const struct qcom_edp_cfg *cfg;
> > > + const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg *cfg;
> > >
> > > struct phy *phy;
> > >
> > > @@ -96,6 +99,8 @@ struct qcom_edp {
> > >
> > > struct clk_bulk_data clks[2];
> > > struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
> > > +
> > > + bool is_edp;
> > > };
> > >
> > > static const u8 dp_swing_hbr_rbr[4][4] = {
> > > @@ -126,8 +131,7 @@ static const u8 dp_pre_emp_hbr2_hbr3[4][4] = {
> > > { 0x04, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
> > > };
> > >
> > > -static const struct qcom_edp_cfg dp_phy_cfg = {
> > > - .is_dp = true,
> > > +static const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg dp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg = {
> > > .swing_hbr_rbr = &dp_swing_hbr_rbr,
> > > .swing_hbr3_hbr2 = &dp_swing_hbr2_hbr3,
> > > .pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr = &dp_pre_emp_hbr_rbr,
> > > @@ -162,18 +166,28 @@ static const u8 edp_pre_emp_hbr2_hbr3[4][4] = {
> > > { 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
> > > };
> > >
> > > -static const struct qcom_edp_cfg edp_phy_cfg = {
> > > - .is_dp = false,
> > > +static const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg edp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg = {
> > > .swing_hbr_rbr = &edp_swing_hbr_rbr,
> > > .swing_hbr3_hbr2 = &edp_swing_hbr2_hbr3,
> > > .pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr = &edp_pre_emp_hbr_rbr,
> > > .pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2 = &edp_pre_emp_hbr2_hbr3,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc7280_dp_phy_cfg = {
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc8280xp_dp_phy_cfg = {
> > > + .swing_pre_emph_cfg = &dp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc8280xp_edp_phy_cfg = {
> > > + .is_edp = true,
> > > + .swing_pre_emph_cfg = &edp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> > > {
> > > struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > > - const struct qcom_edp_cfg *cfg = edp->cfg;
> > > int ret;
> > > u8 cfg8;
> > >
> > > @@ -200,7 +214,7 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> > > DP_PHY_PD_CTL_PLL_PWRDN | DP_PHY_PD_CTL_DP_CLAMP_EN,
> > > edp->edp + DP_PHY_PD_CTL);
> > >
> > > - if (cfg && cfg->is_dp)
> > > + if (edp->cfg->swing_pre_emph_cfg && !edp->is_edp)
> >
> > I think (!edp->is_edp) should be enough here.
>
> Actually, in case of DP, the cfg8 needs to be 0xb7 for sc8280xp, while for sc7280 it should be 0x37.
>
> So to differentiate between first and second we check if the config
> provides a swing_pre_emph_cfg

Using swing_pre_emph_cfg to distinguish between those two cases is a pure hack.
Is there any sensible meaning behind those bits? If not, just put
those values into the configuration data.

>
> >
> > > cfg8 = 0xb7;
> > > else
> > > cfg8 = 0x37;
> > > @@ -234,7 +248,7 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> > >
> > > static int qcom_edp_set_voltages(struct qcom_edp *edp, const struct phy_configure_opts_dp *dp_opts)
> > > {
> > > - const struct qcom_edp_cfg *cfg = edp->cfg;
> > > + const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg *cfg = edp->cfg->swing_pre_emph_cfg;
> > > unsigned int v_level = 0;
> > > unsigned int p_level = 0;
> > > u8 ldo_config;
> > > @@ -245,6 +259,9 @@ static int qcom_edp_set_voltages(struct qcom_edp *edp, const struct phy_configur
> > > if (!cfg)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > + if (edp->is_edp)
> > > + cfg = &edp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg;
> > > +
> > > for (i = 0; i < dp_opts->lanes; i++) {
> > > v_level = max(v_level, dp_opts->voltage[i]);
> > > p_level = max(p_level, dp_opts->pre[i]);
> > > @@ -261,7 +278,7 @@ static int qcom_edp_set_voltages(struct qcom_edp *edp, const struct phy_configur
> > > if (swing == 0xff || emph == 0xff)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - ldo_config = (cfg && cfg->is_dp) ? 0x1 : 0x0;
> > > + ldo_config = edp->is_edp ? 0x0 : 0x1;
> > >
> > > writel(ldo_config, edp->tx0 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
> > > writel(swing, edp->tx0 + TXn_TX_DRV_LVL);
> > > @@ -447,10 +464,9 @@ static int qcom_edp_set_vco_div(const struct qcom_edp *edp, unsigned long *pixel
> > > static int qcom_edp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> > > {
> > > const struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > > - const struct qcom_edp_cfg *cfg = edp->cfg;
> > > u32 bias0_en, drvr0_en, bias1_en, drvr1_en;
> > > unsigned long pixel_freq;
> > > - u8 ldo_config;
> > > + u8 ldo_config = 0x0;
> > > int timeout;
> > > int ret;
> > > u32 val;
> > > @@ -468,7 +484,8 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> > > return timeout;
> > >
> > >
> > > - ldo_config = (cfg && cfg->is_dp) ? 0x1 : 0x0;
> > > + if (edp->cfg->swing_pre_emph_cfg && !edp->cfg->is_edp)
> >
> > I'd assume this should be `if (!edp->is_edp)`, see qcom_edp_set_voltages()
> >
>
> Yep. will fix.
>
> > > + ldo_config = 0x1;
> > >
> > > writel(ldo_config, edp->tx0 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
> > > writel(ldo_config, edp->tx1 + TXn_LDO_CONFIG);
> > > @@ -589,6 +606,18 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int qcom_edp_phy_set_mode(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode)
> > > +{
> > > + struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > > +
> > > + if (mode != PHY_MODE_DP)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + edp->is_edp = submode == PHY_SUBMODE_EDP ? true : false;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int qcom_edp_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
> > > {
> > > struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > > @@ -604,6 +633,7 @@ static const struct phy_ops qcom_edp_ops = {
> > > .configure = qcom_edp_phy_configure,
> > > .power_on = qcom_edp_phy_power_on,
> > > .power_off = qcom_edp_phy_power_off,
> > > + .set_mode = qcom_edp_phy_set_mode,
> > > .exit = qcom_edp_phy_exit,
> > > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > > };
> > > @@ -781,6 +811,7 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >
> > > edp->dev = dev;
> > > edp->cfg = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > > + edp->is_edp = edp->cfg->is_edp;
> > >
> > > edp->edp = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > > if (IS_ERR(edp->edp))
> > > @@ -839,10 +870,10 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > }
> > >
> > > static const struct of_device_id qcom_edp_phy_match_table[] = {
> > > - { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-edp-phy" },
> > > - { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-edp-phy" },
> > > - { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp-phy", .data = &dp_phy_cfg },
> > > - { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp-phy", .data = &edp_phy_cfg },
> > > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-edp-phy" , .data = &sc7280_dp_phy_cfg, },
> > > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-edp-phy", .data = &sc7280_dp_phy_cfg, },
> > > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp-phy", .data = &sc8280xp_dp_phy_cfg, },
> > > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-edp-phy", .data = &sc8280xp_edp_phy_cfg, },
> > > { }
> > > };
> > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_edp_phy_match_table);
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry

--
With best wishes
Dmitry

Next message: kernel test robot: "drivers/of/unittest.c:573:43: error: 'struct device_node' has no member named 'kobj'"
Previous message: David Laight: "RE: [PATCH 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Implement ssprintf() to catch truncated strings"
In reply to: Abel Vesa: "Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] phy: qcom: edp: Add set_mode op for configuring eDP/DP submode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]