Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add system bus request info

[Conor Dooley]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:19:24AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 05:23:53PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:46:39PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 23/01/2024 20:22, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:42:27PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 01:02:21PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > >>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 05:51:48PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:49:27PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 05:27:13PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:02:05PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> Add device tree binding allow platform overwrite default value of *REQIN in
> > > >>>>>>> GSBUSCFG0.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Why might a platform actually want to do this? Why does this need to be
> > > >>>>>> set at the board level and being aware of which SoC is in use is not
> > > >>>>>> sufficient for the driver to set the correct values?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> In snps,dwc3.yaml, there are already similary proptery, such as
> > > >>>>> snps,incr-burst-type-adjustment. Use this method can keep whole dwc3 usb
> > > >>>>> driver keep consistent. And not all platform try enable hardware
> > > >>>>> dma_cohenrence. It is configable for difference platform.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> When you say "platform", what do you mean? I understand that term to
> > > >>>> mean a combination of board, soc and firmware.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> In my company's environment, "platform" is "board". I will use "board" in
> > > >>> future. Is it big difference here?
> > > >>
> > > >> Nah, that's close enough that it makes no difference here.
> > > >>
> > > >> I'd still like an explanation for why a platform would need to actually
> > > >> set these properties though, and why information about coherency cannot
> > > >> be determined from whether or not the boss the usb controller is on is
> > > >> communicated to be dma coherent via the existing devicetree properties
> > > >> for that purpose.
> > > > 
> > > > Actually, I am not very clear about reason. I guest maybe treat off power
> > > > consumption and performance.
> > > > 
> > > > What's your judgement about proptery, which should be in dts. Such as
> > > > reg, clk, reset, dma and irq, which is tighted with SOC. It is the fixed
> > > > value for every SOC. The board dts never change these.
> > > 
> > > Then it can be deduced from the compatible and there is no need for new
> > > properties.
> > 
> > Okay, I think "*reqinfo" match this. When new Soc(using compatible dwc usb
> > controller) appear regardless dma-cohorence or not, connect by AXI3 or
> > AXI4, needn't add new propterties. 
> 
> Anyone have objection? I will prepare v2 to fix rob's bot error.

I'm not sure what you want me to object to/not object to.
Your last message said "needn't add new propterties", seemingly in
agreement with Krzysztoff saying that it can be deduced from the
compatible. That seems like a good way forward for me.

Thanks,
Conor.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature