RE: [RFC v1 0/2] riscv: Cache Population Code Refactoring for ACPI and DT Support

[JeeHeng Sia]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 7:50 PM
> To: JeeHeng Sia <jeeheng.sia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx; palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx; conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; suagrfillet@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RFC v1 0/2] riscv: Cache Population Code Refactoring for ACPI and DT Support
> 
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 11:59:55PM -0800, Sia Jee Heng wrote:
> > This series of patches refactors the cache population function to
> > seamlessly accommodate both DT and ACPI-based platforms. Additionally,
> > to streamline the code, the unused parameter in the ci_leaf_init()
> > function has been removed.
> 
> Why's this an RFC? I don't see any mention of why.
My bad, I should have mentioned the reason in the cover letter.
Btw, the reason treating this as RFC patch is because I am seeking for more
opinions as it is the first try for riscv acpi based cacheinfo.
> 
> Thanks,
> Conor.
> 
> >
> > Sia Jee Heng (2):
> >   riscv: cacheinfo: Remove unused parameter
> >   riscv: cacheinfo: Refactor populate_cache_leaves()
> >
> >  arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 50 ++++++++++++++---------------------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > base-commit: 41bccc98fb7931d63d03f326a746ac4d429c1dd3
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv