Re: [PATCH] fpga: dfl: fme: Return directly after a failed devm_kasprintf() call in fme_perf_pmu_register()
From: Xu Yilun
Date: Tue Jan 30 2024 - 05:07:58 EST
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 03:55:19PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:43:42 +0100
>
> The result from a call of the function “devm_kasprintf” was passed to
> a subsequent function call without checking for a null pointer before
> (according to a memory allocation failure).
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Thus return directly after a failed devm_kasprintf() call.
>
> Fixes: 724142f8c42a7 ("fpga: dfl: fme: add performance reporting support")
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c
> index 7422d2bc6f37..db56d52411ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c
> @@ -925,6 +925,8 @@ static int fme_perf_pmu_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE;
>
> name = devm_kasprintf(priv->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "dfl_fme%d", pdev->id);
> + if (!name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> ret = perf_pmu_register(pmu, name, -1);
> if (ret)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>