Re: [PATCH 00/46] Dynamic allocation of reserved_mem array.

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 03:53:39PM -0800, Oreoluwa Babatunde wrote:
> The reserved_mem array is used to store data for the different
> reserved memory regions defined in the DT of a device.  The array
> stores information such as region name, node, start-address, and size
> of the reserved memory regions.
> 
> The array is currently statically allocated with a size of
> MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS(64). This means that any system that specifies a
> number of reserved memory regions greater than MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS(64)
> will not have enough space to store the information for all the regions.
> 
> Therefore, this series extends the use of the static array for
> reserved_mem, and introduces a dynamically allocated array using
> memblock_alloc() based on the number of reserved memory regions
> specified in the DT.
> 
> Some architectures such as arm64 require the page tables to be setup
> before memblock allocated memory is writable.  Therefore, the dynamic
> allocation of the reserved_mem array will need to be done after the
> page tables have been setup on these architectures. In most cases that
> will be after paging_init().
> 
> Reserved memory regions can be divided into 2 groups.
> i) Statically-placed reserved memory regions
> i.e. regions defined in the DT using the @reg property.
> ii) Dynamically-placed reserved memory regions.
> i.e. regions specified in the DT using the @alloc_ranges
>     and @size properties.
> 
> It is possible to call memblock_reserve() and memblock_mark_nomap() on
> the statically-placed reserved memory regions and not need to save them
> to the reserved_mem array until memory is allocated for it using
> memblock, which will be after the page tables have been setup.
> For the dynamically-placed reserved memory regions, it is not possible
> to wait to store its information because the starting address is
> allocated only at run time, and hence they need to be stored somewhere
> after they are allocated.
> Waiting until after the page tables have been setup to allocate memory
> for the dynamically-placed regions is also not an option because the
> allocations will come from memory that have already been added to the
> page tables, which is not good for memory that is supposed to be
> reserved and/or marked as nomap.
> 
> Therefore, this series splits up the processing of the reserved memory
> regions into two stages, of which the first stage is carried out by
> early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem() and the second is carried out by
> fdt_init_reserved_mem().
> 
> The early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem(), which is called before the page
> tables are setup is used to:
> 1. Call memblock_reserve() and memblock_mark_nomap() on all the
>    statically-placed reserved memory regions as needed.
> 2. Allocate memory from memblock for the dynamically-placed reserved
>    memory regions and store them in the static array for reserved_mem.
>    memblock_reserve() and memblock_mark_nomap() are also called as
>    needed on all the memory allocated for the dynamically-placed
>    regions.
> 3. Count the total number of reserved memory regions found in the DT.
> 
> fdt_init_reserved_mem(), which should be called after the page tables
> have been setup, is used to carry out the following:
> 1. Allocate memory for the reserved_mem array based on the number of
>    reserved memory regions counted as mentioned above.
> 2. Copy all the information for the dynamically-placed reserved memory
>    regions from the static array into the new allocated memory for the
>    reserved_mem array.
> 3. Add the information for the statically-placed reserved memory into
>    reserved_mem array.
> 4. Run the region specific init functions for each of the reserve memory
>    regions saved in the reserved_mem array.

I don't see the need for fdt_init_reserved_mem() to be explicitly called 
by arch code. I said this already, but that can be done at the same time 
as unflattening the DT. The same conditions are needed for both: we need 
to be able to allocate memory from memblock.

To put it another way, if fdt_init_reserved_mem() can be called "early", 
then unflattening could be moved earlier as well. Though I don't think 
we should optimize that. I'd rather see all arches call the DT functions 
at the same stages.

> Once the above steps have been completed and the init process is done
> running, the original statically allocated reserved_mem array of size
> MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS(64) will be automatically freed back to buddy
> because it is no longer needed. This is done by marking the array as an
> "__initdata" object in Patch 0018.
> 
> Note:
> 
> - Per Architecture, this series is effectively only 10 patches. The
>   code for each architecture is split up into separate patches to
>   allow each architecture to be tested independently of changes from
>   other architectures. Should this series be accepted, this should
>   allow for each arcitecture change to be picked up independently as
>   well.

Only if patches 1 and 2 are accepted in one cycle and the arch ones in 
the next cycle. No need for that though, I can take the whole thing 
(when it's ready).


> 
>   Patch 0001: Splits up the processing of the reserved memory regions
>   between early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem and fdt_init_reserved_mem.
> 
>   Patch 0002: Introduces a copy of early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem()
>   which is used to separate it from fdt_init_reserved_mem() so that the
>   two functions can be called independently of each other.
> 
>   Patch 0003 - Patch 0016: Duplicated change for each architecture to
>   call early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem() and fdt_init_reserved_mem()
>   at their appropriate locations. Here fdt_init_reserved_mem() is called
>   either before of after the page tables have been setup depending on
>   the architecture requirements.
> 
>   Patch 0017: Deletes the early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem() function
>   since all architectures are now using the copy introduced in
>   Patch 0002.
> 
>   Patch 0018: Dynamically allocate memory for the reserved_mem array
>   based on the total number of reserved memory regions specified in the
>   DT.
> 
>   Patch 0019 - Patch 0029: Duplicated change for each architecture to
>   move the fdt_init_reserved_mem() function call to below the
>   unflatten_devicetree() function call. This is so that the unflatten
>   devicetree APIs can be used to process the reserved memory regions.
> 
>   Patch 0030: Make code changes to start using the unflatten devicetree
>   APIs to access the reserved memory regions defined in the DT.
> 
>   Patch 0031: Rename fdt_* functions as dt_* to refelct that the
>   flattened devicetree (fdt) APIs have been replaced with the unflatten
>   devicetree APIs.
> 
>   Patch 0032 - Patch 0045: Duplicated change for each architecture to
>   switch from the use of fdt_init_reserved_mem() to
>   dt_init_reserved_mem(), which is the same function but the later uses
>   the unflatten devicetree APIs.
> 
>   Patch 0046: Delete the fdt_init_reserved_mem() function as all
>   architectures have switched to using dt_init_reserved_mem() which was
>   introduced in Patch 0031.
> 
> - The limitation to this approach is that there is still a limit of
>   64 for dynamically-placed reserved memory regions. But from my current
>   analysis, these types of reserved memory regions are generally less
>   in number when compared to the statically-placed reserved memory
>   regions.
> 
> - I have looked through all architectures and placed the call to
>   memblock_alloc() for the reserved_mem array at points where I
>   believe memblock allocated memory are available to be written to.
>   I currently only have access to an arm64 device and this is where I am
>   testing the functionality of this series. Hence, I will need help from
>   architecture maintainers to test this series on other architectures to
>   ensure that the code is functioning properly on there.
> 
> Previous patch revisions:
> 1. [RFC V1 Patchset]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231019184825.9712-1-quic_obabatun@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> 2. [RFC V2 Patchset]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231204041339.9902-1-quic_obabatun@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> - Extend changes to all other relevant architectures.
> - Add code to use unflatten devicetree APIs to process the reserved
>   memory regions.

Dropping RFC does not make this v1. RFC is a state of the patches not a 
version.

Rob