Re: [PATCH 2/6] soundwire: sysfs: move sdw_slave_dev_attr_group into the existing list of groups

[Dan Williams]

Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> The sysfs logic already creates a list of groups for the device, so add
> the sdw_slave_dev_attr_group group to that list instead of having to do
> a two-step process of adding a group list and then an individual group.
> 
> This is a step on the way to moving all of the sysfs attribute handling
> into the default driver core attribute group logic so that the soundwire
> core does not have to do any of it manually.
> 
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/soundwire/sysfs_slave.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/sysfs_slave.c b/drivers/soundwire/sysfs_slave.c
> index 3210359cd944..83e3f6cc3250 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/sysfs_slave.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/sysfs_slave.c
> @@ -105,7 +105,10 @@ static struct attribute *slave_attrs[] = {
>  	&dev_attr_modalias.attr,
>  	NULL,
>  };
> -ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(slave);
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group slave_attr_group = {
> +	.attrs = slave_attrs,
> +};
>  
>  static struct attribute *slave_dev_attrs[] = {
>  	&dev_attr_mipi_revision.attr,
> @@ -190,6 +193,12 @@ static const struct attribute_group dp0_group = {
>  	.name = "dp0",
>  };
>  
> +static const struct attribute_group *slave_groups[] = {
> +	&slave_attr_group,
> +	&sdw_slave_dev_attr_group,
> +	NULL,
> +};
> +
>  int sdw_slave_sysfs_init(struct sdw_slave *slave)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -198,10 +207,6 @@ int sdw_slave_sysfs_init(struct sdw_slave *slave)
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = devm_device_add_group(&slave->dev, &sdw_slave_dev_attr_group);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> -

Yeah, open-coding the groups, much better than dynamically adding one.

>  	if (slave->prop.dp0_prop) {
>  		ret = devm_device_add_group(&slave->dev, &dp0_group);
>  		if (ret < 0)

Makes sense. I won't say "looks good" as this file has "slave" all over
the place, but I checked and it entered the kernel just before the
CodingStyle changed.

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>