Re: [PATCH v2] nvmem: u-boot-env: improve error checking

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 30.01.2024 20:42, Nick Spooner wrote:
> Coverity scan reported CID 1575482: error handling issues; this patch
> addresses this by adding error handling to u_boot_env_add_cells.

I'd appreciate description why do we need this change other than
addressing some Coverity report.

Should a single nvmem_add_one_cell() failure result in not registering
NVMEM device at all? Why?


> Signed-off-by: Nick Spooner <nicholas.spooner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:
>      Fix whitespace issues in previous version
>
>   drivers/nvmem/u-boot-env.c | 5 ++++-
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/u-boot-env.c b/drivers/nvmem/u-boot-env.c
> index befbab156cda..c15de5f7fd99 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/u-boot-env.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/u-boot-env.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ static int u_boot_env_add_cells(struct u_boot_env *priv, uint8_t *buf,
>   	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
>   	char *data = buf + data_offset;
>   	char *var, *value, *eq;
> +	int rval;
>
>   	for (var = data;
>   	     var < data + data_len && *var;
> @@ -119,7 +120,9 @@ static int u_boot_env_add_cells(struct u_boot_env *priv, uint8_t *buf,
>   			info.read_post_process = u_boot_env_read_post_process_ethaddr;
>   		}
>
> -		nvmem_add_one_cell(nvmem, &info);
> +		rval = nvmem_add_one_cell(nvmem, &info);
> +		if (rval)
> +			return rval;
>   	}
>
>   	return 0;
> --
> 2.34.1