Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: mmap: map MAP_STACK to VM_NOHUGEPAGE

From: Florian Weimer
Date: Wed Jan 31 2024 - 02:54:02 EST


* Yang Shi:

> From: Yang Shi <yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The commit efa7df3e3bb5 ("mm: align larger anonymous mappings on THP
> boundaries") incured regression for stress-ng pthread benchmark [1].
> It is because THP get allocated to pthread's stack area much more possible
> than before. Pthread's stack area is allocated by mmap without VM_GROWSDOWN
> or VM_GROWSUP flag, so kernel can't tell whether it is a stack area or not.
>
> The MAP_STACK flag is used to mark the stack area, but it is a no-op on
> Linux. Mapping MAP_STACK to VM_NOHUGEPAGE to prevent from allocating
> THP for such stack area.

Doesn't this introduce a regression in the other direction, where
workloads expect to use a hugepage TLB entry for the stack?

It's seems an odd approach to fixing the stress-ng regression. Isn't it
very much coding to the benchmark?

Thanks,
Florian