Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] Add tuning algorithm for delay chain
From: Raghavendra, Vignesh
Date: Wed Jan 31 2024 - 08:35:26 EST
Hi,
On 1/31/2024 6:07 AM, Judith Mendez wrote:
> This patch series introduces a new tuning algorithm for
> mmc. The new algorithm should be used when delay chain is
> enabled. The ITAPDLY is selected from the largest passing
> window and the buffer is not viewed as a circular buffer.
> The new tuning algorithm is implemented as per the paper
> published here [0] and has been tested on the following
> platforms: AM62x SK, AM62A SK, AM62p SK, AM64x SK, and AM64x
> EVM.
>
> The series also includes a few fixes in the sdhci_am654
> driver on OTAPDLYEN/ITAPDLYEN and ITAPDELSEL. There are
> also device tree node fixes for missing mmc nodes,
> modifying DLL properties, and fixes for OTAP/ITAP delay
> values.
>
> MMC0/MMC2 nodes are introduced for AM62ax in this series.
>
> This series is sent as a RFC mostly to get some feedback
> and/or comments on the new tuning algorithm implementation.
>
> [0] https://www.ti.com/lit/an/spract9/spract9.pdf
>
> Judith Mendez (11):
> drivers: mmc: host: sdhci_am654: Add tuning algorithm for delay chain
> drivers: mmc: host: sdhci_am654: Write ITAPDLY for DDR52 timing
> drivers: mmc: host: sdhci_am654: Add missing OTAP/ITAP enable
> drivers: mmc: host: sdhci_am654: Add ITAPDLYSEL in
> sdhci_j721e_4bit_set_clock
> drivers: mmc: host: sdhci_am654: Fix ITAPDLY for HS400 timing
These patches needs to have Fixes: tag as they are bug fixes IMO.
> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a-main: Add sdhci2 instance
> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64-main: Update ITAP/OTAP values for MMC
> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-main: Update ITAP/OTAP values for MMC
> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: Add missing properties for MMC
> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am6*: Remove DLL properties for soft phys
> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am6*: Reorganize MMC properties
>
> Nitin Yadav (2):
> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a-main: Add sdhci0 instance
> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Enable eMMC support
>
Can the driver changes be merged independent of DT changes? Or are they
meant to go together? Latter would be problematic as it creates cross
tree dependencies.
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-main.dtsi | 57 +++--
> .../arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-beagleplay.dts | 5 -
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a-main.dtsi | 45 +++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts | 27 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-main.dtsi | 44 +++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p5-sk.dts | 7 +-
> .../arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62x-sk-common.dtsi | 4 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi | 17 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts | 4 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts | 2 -
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 215 ++++++++++++++----
> 11 files changed, 321 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
>