Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] perf: imx_perf: refactor driver for imx93

From: Frank Li
Date: Wed Jan 31 2024 - 10:27:15 EST

Next message: Florian Westphal: "Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (netfilter, xtables)"
Previous message: Palmer Dabbelt: "Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] lib: checksum: Fix issues with checksum tests"
In reply to: Xu Yang: "[PATCH v4 2/6] perf: imx_perf: refactor driver for imx93"
Next in thread: Xu Yang: "[PATCH v4 3/6] perf: imx_perf: add support for i.MX95 platform"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 01:58:07PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote:
> This driver is initinally used to support imx93 Soc and now it's time to
> add support for imx95 Soc. However, some macro definitions and events are
> different on these two Socs. For preparing imx95 supports, this will
> refactor driver for imx93.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>

>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - new patch
> ---
> drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> index 9685645bfe04..b1a58e9e1617 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> @@ -11,14 +11,14 @@
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>
> /* Performance monitor configuration */
> -#define PMCFG1 0x00
> -#define PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN BIT(31)
> -#define PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN BIT(30)
> -#define PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN BIT(29)
> -#define PMCFG1_ID_MASK GENMASK(17, 0)
> +#define PMCFG1 0x00
> +#define MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN BIT(31)
> +#define MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN BIT(30)
> +#define MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN BIT(29)
> +#define MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK GENMASK(17, 0)
>
> -#define PMCFG2 0x04
> -#define PMCFG2_ID GENMASK(17, 0)
> +#define PMCFG2 0x04
> +#define MX93_PMCFG2_ID GENMASK(17, 0)
>
> /* Global control register affects all counters and takes priority over local control registers */
> #define PMGC0 0x40
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(ddr_ida);
>
> struct imx_ddr_devtype_data {
> const char *identifier; /* system PMU identifier for userspace */
> + struct attribute **attrs; /* AXI filter attributes */
> };
>
> struct ddr_pmu {
> @@ -67,16 +68,6 @@ struct ddr_pmu {
> int id;
> };
>
> -static const struct imx_ddr_devtype_data imx93_devtype_data = {
> - .identifier = "imx93",
> -};
> -
> -static const struct of_device_id imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids[] = {
> - {.compatible = "fsl,imx93-ddr-pmu", .data = &imx93_devtype_data},
> - { /* sentinel */ }
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids);
> -
> static ssize_t ddr_perf_identifier_show(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *page)
> @@ -178,7 +169,6 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_ld_wiq_6, 70),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_ld_wiq_7, 71),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_empty, 72),
> - IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt, 73),
>
> /* counter3 specific events */
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_0, 64),
> @@ -190,7 +180,6 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_6, 70),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_7, 71),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_full, 72),
> - IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt, 73),
>
> /* counter4 specific events */
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_0, 64),
> @@ -202,7 +191,6 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_6, 70),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_7, 71),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_ld_rdq2_rmw, 72),
> - IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt, 73),
>
> /* counter5 specific events */
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_valid_start_0, 64),
> @@ -242,6 +230,16 @@ static const struct attribute_group ddr_perf_events_attr_group = {
> .attrs = ddr_perf_events_attrs,
> };
>
> +static struct attribute *imx93_ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> + /* counter2 specific events */
> + IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt, 73),
> + /* counter3 specific events */
> + IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt, 73),
> + /* counter4 specific events */
> + IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt, 73),
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-7");
> PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(counter, "config:8-15");
> PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(axi_id, "config1:0-17");
> @@ -268,6 +266,22 @@ static const struct attribute_group *attr_groups[] = {
> NULL,
> };
>
> +static const struct imx_ddr_devtype_data imx93_devtype_data = {
> + .identifier = "imx93",
> + .attrs = imx93_ddr_perf_events_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-ddr-pmu", .data = &imx93_devtype_data },
> + { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids);
> +
> +static inline bool is_imx93(struct ddr_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> + return pmu->devtype_data == &imx93_devtype_data;
> +}
> +
> static void ddr_perf_clear_counter(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int counter)
> {
> if (counter == CYCLES_COUNTER) {
> @@ -361,7 +375,7 @@ static void ddr_perf_counter_local_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int config,
> }
> }
>
> -static void ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int cfg, int cfg1, int cfg2)
> +static void imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int cfg, int cfg1, int cfg2)
> {
> u32 pmcfg1, pmcfg2;
> int event, counter;
> @@ -372,27 +386,27 @@ static void ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int cfg, int cfg1, int
> pmcfg1 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG1);
>
> if (counter == 2 && event == 73)
> - pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> + pmcfg1 |= MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> else if (counter == 2 && event != 73)
> - pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> + pmcfg1 &= ~MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
>
> if (counter == 3 && event == 73)
> - pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> + pmcfg1 |= MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> else if (counter == 3 && event != 73)
> - pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> + pmcfg1 &= ~MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
>
> if (counter == 4 && event == 73)
> - pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
> + pmcfg1 |= MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
> else if (counter == 4 && event != 73)
> - pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
> + pmcfg1 &= ~MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
>
> - pmcfg1 &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMCFG1_ID_MASK, 0x3FFFF);
> - pmcfg1 |= FIELD_PREP(PMCFG1_ID_MASK, cfg2);
> + pmcfg1 &= ~FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK, 0x3FFFF);
> + pmcfg1 |= FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK, cfg2);
> writel(pmcfg1, pmu->base + PMCFG1);
>
> pmcfg2 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG2);
> - pmcfg2 &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMCFG2_ID, 0x3FFFF);
> - pmcfg2 |= FIELD_PREP(PMCFG2_ID, cfg1);
> + pmcfg2 &= ~FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG2_ID, 0x3FFFF);
> + pmcfg2 |= FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG2_ID, cfg1);
> writel(pmcfg2, pmu->base + PMCFG2);
> }
>
> @@ -476,12 +490,12 @@ static int ddr_perf_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> hwc->idx = counter;
> hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED;
>
> + /* read trans, write trans, read beat */
> + imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, cfg, cfg1, cfg2);
> +
> if (flags & PERF_EF_START)
> ddr_perf_event_start(event, flags);
>
> - /* read trans, write trans, read beat */
> - ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, cfg, cfg1, cfg2);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -596,6 +610,39 @@ static int ddr_perf_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int ddr_perf_add_events(struct ddr_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> + int i, ret;
> + struct attribute **attrs = pmu->devtype_data->attrs;
> + struct device *pmu_dev = pmu->pmu.dev;
> +
> + if (!attrs)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; attrs[i]; i++) {
> + ret = sysfs_add_file_to_group(&pmu_dev->kobj, attrs[i], "events");
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_warn(pmu->dev, "i.MX9 DDR Perf add events failed (%d)\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ddr_perf_remove_events(struct ddr_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct attribute **attrs = pmu->devtype_data->attrs;
> + struct device *pmu_dev = pmu->pmu.dev;
> +
> + if (!attrs)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; attrs[i]; i++)
> + sysfs_remove_file_from_group(&pmu_dev->kobj, attrs[i], "events");
> +}
> +
> static int ddr_perf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct ddr_pmu *pmu;
> @@ -666,6 +713,10 @@ static int ddr_perf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> goto ddr_perf_err;
>
> + ret = ddr_perf_add_events(pmu);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "i.MX9 DDR Perf filter events are missing\n");
> +
> return 0;
>
> ddr_perf_err:
> @@ -683,6 +734,8 @@ static int ddr_perf_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct ddr_pmu *pmu = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> + ddr_perf_remove_events(pmu);
> +
> cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(pmu->cpuhp_state, &pmu->node);
> cpuhp_remove_multi_state(pmu->cpuhp_state);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Next message: Florian Westphal: "Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 30 (netfilter, xtables)"
Previous message: Palmer Dabbelt: "Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] lib: checksum: Fix issues with checksum tests"
In reply to: Xu Yang: "[PATCH v4 2/6] perf: imx_perf: refactor driver for imx93"
Next in thread: Xu Yang: "[PATCH v4 3/6] perf: imx_perf: add support for i.MX95 platform"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]