[PATCH v3 10/47] lockd: convert to using new filelock helpers
From: Jeff Layton
Date: Wed Jan 31 2024 - 18:07:17 EST
Convert to using the new file locking helper functions. Also in later
patches we're going to introduce some macros with names that clash with
the variable names in nlmclnt_lock. Rename them.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/lockd/clntproc.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
fs/lockd/svcsubs.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/lockd/clntproc.c b/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
index fba6c7fa7474..cc596748e359 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
@@ -522,8 +522,8 @@ nlmclnt_lock(struct nlm_rqst *req, struct file_lock *fl)
struct nlm_host *host = req->a_host;
struct nlm_res *resp = &req->a_res;
struct nlm_wait block;
- unsigned char fl_flags = fl->fl_flags;
- unsigned char fl_type;
+ unsigned char flags = fl->fl_flags;
+ unsigned char type;
__be32 b_status;
int status = -ENOLCK;
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ nlmclnt_lock(struct nlm_rqst *req, struct file_lock *fl)
fl->fl_flags |= FL_ACCESS;
status = do_vfs_lock(fl);
- fl->fl_flags = fl_flags;
+ fl->fl_flags = flags;
if (status < 0)
goto out;
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ nlmclnt_lock(struct nlm_rqst *req, struct file_lock *fl)
if (do_vfs_lock(fl) < 0)
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: VFS is out of sync with lock manager!\n", __func__);
up_read(&host->h_rwsem);
- fl->fl_flags = fl_flags;
+ fl->fl_flags = flags;
status = 0;
}
if (status < 0)
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ nlmclnt_lock(struct nlm_rqst *req, struct file_lock *fl)
* cases NLM_LCK_DENIED is returned for a permanent error. So
* turn it into an ENOLCK.
*/
- if (resp->status == nlm_lck_denied && (fl_flags & FL_SLEEP))
+ if (resp->status == nlm_lck_denied && (flags & FL_SLEEP))
status = -ENOLCK;
else
status = nlm_stat_to_errno(resp->status);
@@ -622,13 +622,13 @@ nlmclnt_lock(struct nlm_rqst *req, struct file_lock *fl)
req->a_host->h_addrlen, req->a_res.status);
dprintk("lockd: lock attempt ended in fatal error.\n"
" Attempting to unlock.\n");
- fl_type = fl->fl_type;
+ type = fl->fl_type;
fl->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
down_read(&host->h_rwsem);
do_vfs_lock(fl);
up_read(&host->h_rwsem);
- fl->fl_type = fl_type;
- fl->fl_flags = fl_flags;
+ fl->fl_type = type;
+ fl->fl_flags = flags;
nlmclnt_async_call(cred, req, NLMPROC_UNLOCK, &nlmclnt_unlock_ops);
return status;
}
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ nlmclnt_unlock(struct nlm_rqst *req, struct file_lock *fl)
struct nlm_host *host = req->a_host;
struct nlm_res *resp = &req->a_res;
int status;
- unsigned char fl_flags = fl->fl_flags;
+ unsigned char flags = fl->fl_flags;
/*
* Note: the server is supposed to either grant us the unlock
@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ nlmclnt_unlock(struct nlm_rqst *req, struct file_lock *fl)
down_read(&host->h_rwsem);
status = do_vfs_lock(fl);
up_read(&host->h_rwsem);
- fl->fl_flags = fl_flags;
+ fl->fl_flags = flags;
if (status == -ENOENT) {
status = 0;
goto out;
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c b/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c
index e3b6229e7ae5..2f33c187b876 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static inline unsigned int file_hash(struct nfs_fh *f)
int lock_to_openmode(struct file_lock *lock)
{
- return (lock->fl_type == F_WRLCK) ? O_WRONLY : O_RDONLY;
+ return (lock_is_write(lock)) ? O_WRONLY : O_RDONLY;
}
/*
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ nlm_traverse_locks(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_file *file,
again:
file->f_locks = 0;
spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(fl, &flctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
+ for_each_file_lock(fl, &flctx->flc_posix) {
if (fl->fl_lmops != &nlmsvc_lock_operations)
continue;
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ nlm_file_inuse(struct nlm_file *file)
if (flctx && !list_empty_careful(&flctx->flc_posix)) {
spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(fl, &flctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
+ for_each_file_lock(fl, &flctx->flc_posix) {
if (fl->fl_lmops == &nlmsvc_lock_operations) {
spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
return 1;
--
2.43.0