Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] printk: Fix LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT when BASE_SMALL is enabled
From: Yoann Congal
Date: Mon Feb 12 2024 - 14:01:49 EST
Le 11/02/2024 à 00:41, Masahiro Yamada a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 2:10 AM Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT default value depends on BASE_SMALL:
>> config LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT
>> default 12 if !BASE_SMALL
>> default 0 if BASE_SMALL
>> But, BASE_SMALL is a config of type int and "!BASE_SMALL" is always
>> evaluated to true whatever is the value of BASE_SMALL.
>>
>> This patch fixes this by using the correct conditional operator for int
>> type : BASE_SMALL != 0.
>>
>> Note: This changes CONFIG_LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT=12 to
>> CONFIG_LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT=0 for BASE_SMALL defconfigs, but that will
>> not be a big impact due to this code in kernel/printk/printk.c:
>> /* by default this will only continue through for large > 64 CPUs */
>> if (cpu_extra <= __LOG_BUF_LEN / 2)
>> return;
>> Systems using CONFIG_BASE_SMALL and having 64+ CPUs should be quite
>> rare.
>>
>> John Ogness <john.ogness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (printk reviewer) wrote:
>>> For printk this will mean that BASE_SMALL systems were probably
>>> previously allocating/using the dynamic ringbuffer and now they will
>>> just continue to use the static ringbuffer. Which is fine and saves
>>> memory (as it should).
>>
>> Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> (printk maintainer) wrote:
>>> More precisely, it allocated the buffer dynamically when the sum
>>> of per-CPU-extra space exceeded half of the default static ring
>>> buffer. This happened for systems with more than 64 CPUs with
>>> the default config values.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@xxxxxxxx>
>> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdWm6u1wX7efZQf=2XUAHascps76YQac6rdnQGhc8nop_Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/f6856be8-54b7-0fa0-1d17-39632bf29ada@xxxxxxxxxx/
>> Fixes: 4e244c10eab3 ("kconfig: remove unneeded symbol_empty variable")
>>
>
>
>
> All the Reviewed-by tags are dropped every time, annoyingly.
Hi!
Was I supposed to gather these tags from patch version N to patch version N+1?
In that case, I'm sorry, I did not know that :-/
Patch 1/3 is exactly the same but patch 2/3 is equivalent but different. Is there a rule written somewhere about when carrying the tags across revision and when not? (I could not find it)
> This is equivalent to v4, which had these tags:
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks a lot!
>
>> ---
>> v3->v4:
>> * Fix BASE_SMALL usage instead of switching to BASE_FULL because
>> BASE_FULL will be removed in the next patches of this series.
>> ---
>> init/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
>> index deda3d14135bb..d50ebd2a2ce42 100644
>> --- a/init/Kconfig
>> +++ b/init/Kconfig
>> @@ -734,8 +734,8 @@ config LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT
>> int "CPU kernel log buffer size contribution (13 => 8 KB, 17 => 128KB)"
>> depends on SMP
>> range 0 21
>> - default 12 if !BASE_SMALL
>> - default 0 if BASE_SMALL
>> + default 0 if BASE_SMALL != 0
>> + default 12
>> depends on PRINTK
>> help
>> This option allows to increase the default ring buffer size
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
--
Yoann Congal
Smile ECS - Tech Expert