Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: rockchip: Fix Hardkernel ODROID-M1 board bindings

[Heiko Stuebner]

Hi Tim,

Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 11:03:26 CET schrieb Tim Lunn:
> On 1/17/24 06:55, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2024, 20:26:05 CET schrieb Rob Herring:
> >> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 09:31:35AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> >>> Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2024, 08:24:44 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> >>>> On 16/01/2024 03:00, Tim Lunn wrote:
> >>>>> On 1/16/24 01:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>>>> On 15/01/2024 15:51, KyuHyuk Lee wrote:
> >>>>>>> The vendor in ODROID-M1 is hardkernel, but it was incorrectly written
> >>>>>>> as rockchip. Fixed the vendor prefix correctly.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: KyuHyuk Lee <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 2 +-
> >>>>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>> You need to start testing your patches. Your last M1 fails as well in
> >>>>>> multiple places.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
> >>>>>> `make dtbs_check W=1` (see
> >>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
> >>>>>> https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/
> >>>>>> for instructions).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The DTS change will break the users, so would be nice to mention this in
> >>>>>> its commit msg.
> >>>>> I notice there are a couple of other boards that incorrectly use
> >>>>> rockchip as the vendor also:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>             - const: rockchip,rk3399-orangepi
> >>>>>             - const: rockchip,rk3568-bpi-r2pro
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Perhaps these should also be fixed at the same time?
> >>>> What is happening with rockchip boards?
> >>> Copy-paste stuff ... boards using rockchip,boardname instead of
> >>> vendor,boardname for their compatible.
> >>>
> >>> I do remember us noticing this a number of times on some boards
> >>> and requesting fixes, but looks like some slipped through.
> >>>
> >>> So I guess Tim is suggesting changing the compatible, but with boards
> >>> being merged a while ago, this would break backwards compatibility.
> >>> So I guess both the Orange and Banana Pies will need to live with that.
> >> You may get away with it because we generally don't use the names...
> >>
> >> Though there are some discussions to start using them to select dtbs by
> >> bootloaders.
> > Ah, that's good to know (both points) ... so essentially right now would be
> > a good time to do what Tim suggested, before the names get actual usage.
> >
> > @Tim: is that something you'd want to do?
> >
> Sure, I will prepare patches and send them out soon.

As I stumbled upon this patch just now, how is that coming along? :-)

Thanks
Heiko