On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:49:14AM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
On 02/09, Oliver Crumrine wrote:
Originally, this patch removed a redundant check in
BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS, as the check was already being done in
the function it called, __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb. For v2, it was
reccomended that I remove the check from __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb,
and add the checks to the other macro that calls that function,
BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS.
To sum it up, checking that the socket exists and that it is a full
socket is now part of both macros BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS and
BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS, and it is no longer part of the
function they call, __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Crumrine <ozlinuxc@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Quick question: My subject had "net:" in it. Should it have had "bpf:" in
the subject instead?
If yes, would this warrant another version of this patch or resending it
with a different subject?