Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: sched: make skip_sw actually skip software

[Jamal Hadi Salim]

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:06 AM Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> TC filters come in 3 variants:
> - no flag (no opinion, process wherever possible)
> - skip_hw (do not process filter by hardware)
> - skip_sw (do not process filter by software)
>
> However skip_sw is implemented so that the skip_sw
> flag can first be checked, after it has been matched.
>
> IMHO it's common when using skip_sw, to use it on all rules.
>
> So if all filters in a block is skip_sw filters, then
> we can bail early, we can thus avoid having to match
> the filters, just to check for the skip_sw flag.
>
>  +----------------------------+--------+--------+--------+
>  | Test description           | Pre    | Post   | Rel.   |
>  |                            | kpps   | kpps   | chg.   |
>  +----------------------------+--------+--------+--------+
>  | basic forwarding + notrack | 1264.9 | 1277.7 |  1.01x |
>  | switch to eswitch mode     | 1067.1 | 1071.0 |  1.00x |
>  | add ingress qdisc          | 1056.0 | 1059.1 |  1.00x |
>  +----------------------------+--------+--------+--------+
>  | 1 non-matching rule        |  927.9 | 1057.1 |  1.14x |
>  | 10 non-matching rules      |  495.8 | 1055.6 |  2.13x |
>  | 25 non-matching rules      |  280.6 | 1053.5 |  3.75x |
>  | 50 non-matching rules      |  162.0 | 1055.7 |  6.52x |
>  | 100 non-matching rules     |   87.7 | 1019.0 | 11.62x |
>  +----------------------------+--------+--------+--------+
>
> perf top (100 n-m skip_sw rules - pre patch):
>   25.57%  [kernel]  [k] __skb_flow_dissect
>   20.77%  [kernel]  [k] rhashtable_jhash2
>   14.26%  [kernel]  [k] fl_classify
>   13.28%  [kernel]  [k] fl_mask_lookup
>    6.38%  [kernel]  [k] memset_orig
>    3.22%  [kernel]  [k] tcf_classify
>
> perf top (100 n-m skip_sw rules - post patch):
>    4.28%  [kernel]  [k] __dev_queue_xmit
>    3.80%  [kernel]  [k] check_preemption_disabled
>    3.68%  [kernel]  [k] nft_do_chain
>    3.08%  [kernel]  [k] __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0
>    2.59%  [kernel]  [k] mlx5e_xmit
>    2.48%  [kernel]  [k] mlx5e_skb_from_cqe_mpwrq_nonlinear
>

The concept makes sense - but i am wondering when you have a mix of
skip_sw and skip_hw if it makes more sense to just avoid looking up
skip_sw at all in the s/w datapath? Potentially by separating the
hashes for skip_sw/hw. I know it's a deeper surgery - but would be
more general purpose....unless i am missing something

> Test setup:
>  DUT: Intel Xeon D-1518 (2.20GHz) w/ Nvidia/Mellanox ConnectX-6 Dx 2x100G
>  Data rate measured on switch (Extreme X690), and DUT connected as
>  a router on a stick, with pktgen and pktsink as VLANs.
>  Pktgen was in range 12.79 - 12.95 Mpps across all tests.
>

Hrm. Those are "tiny" numbers (25G @64B is about 3x that). What are
the packet sizes?
Perhaps the traffic generator is a limitation here?
Also feels like you are doing exact matches? A sample flower rule
would have helped.

cheers,
jamal
> Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/net/pkt_cls.h | 5 +++++
>  net/core/dev.c        | 3 +++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/pkt_cls.h b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
> index a4ee43f493bb..a065da4df7ff 100644
> --- a/include/net/pkt_cls.h
> +++ b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ static inline bool tcf_block_non_null_shared(struct tcf_block *block)
>         return block && block->index;
>  }
>
> +static inline bool tcf_block_has_skip_sw_only(struct tcf_block *block)
> +{
> +       return block && atomic_read(&block->filtercnt) == atomic_read(&block->skipswcnt);
> +}
> +
>  static inline struct Qdisc *tcf_block_q(struct tcf_block *block)
>  {
>         WARN_ON(tcf_block_shared(block));
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index d8dd293a7a27..7cd014e5066e 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -3910,6 +3910,9 @@ static int tc_run(struct tcx_entry *entry, struct sk_buff *skb,
>         if (!miniq)
>                 return ret;
>
> +       if (tcf_block_has_skip_sw_only(miniq->block))
> +               return ret;
> +
>         tc_skb_cb(skb)->mru = 0;
>         tc_skb_cb(skb)->post_ct = false;
>         tcf_set_drop_reason(skb, *drop_reason);
> --
> 2.43.0
>