Re: (subset) [linux][PATCH v6 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello Krzysztof,

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:44:53PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/02/2024 11:02, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:23:02AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 08/02/2024 11:43, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>> Applied, thanks!
> >>>
> >>> [3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,hlcdc: Convert to DT schema format
> >>>       commit: cb946db1335b599ece363d33966bf653ed0fa58a
> >>>
> >>
> >> Next is still failing.
> > 
> > Failing in the sense of dtbs_check, right?
> 
> No, bindings were failing. dt_binding_check. This must not fail, so kind
> of bummer...
> 
> >> Dharma,
> >> You must explain and clearly mark dependencies between patches.
> >>
> >> Lee,
> >> Can you pick up two previous patches as well?
> > 
> > I applied the pwm patch now. If Lee wants to pick up this one via his
> > tree that would be fine for me, too. If that's the case please tell me,
> > then I'll drop it from my for-next branch again. Feel free to add
> > my Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for patch
> > #2 then.
> 
> At least next is happy.

The pwm binding is in next now (as
0fa319a1427f7c8d0af4c255316624f7e6f649a0) but dt_binding_check still
tells me (among others):

	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,hlcdc.yaml:
	Error in referenced schema matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/atmel/atmel,hlcdc-display-controller.yaml

This is what you meant, right? This goes away as soon as the first patch
(dt-bindings: display: convert Atmel's HLCDC to DT schema) is applied,
too. So next isn't completely happy yet.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature