Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: rockchip: rst-rk3588: Add BIU reset

[Shreeya Patel]

On Saturday, February 17, 2024 15:50 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 17/02/2024 11:18, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 17, 2024 13:47 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 16/02/2024 13:48, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> >>> On Friday, February 16, 2024 15:33 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 16/02/2024 10:49, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> >>>>> Export hdmirx_biu soft reset id which is required by the hdmirx controller.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c               | 1 +
> >>>>>  include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h | 2 ++
> >>>>
> >>>> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some
> >>>> warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix.
> >>>> Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please do internal review. The internal Collabora review would tell you:
> >>>> YOU MUST run checkpatch. Then you see errors, so why do you send patch
> >>>> with errors to the mailing list?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I am sorry but what errors are you talking about?
> >>> I don't see any errors reported by checkpatch :-
> >>>
> >>> shreeya@shreeya:~/collabora/rd/rockchip/torvalds$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl hdmirx/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch
> >>> WARNING: DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch. See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
> >>
> >> Here.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 13 lines checked
> >>>
> >>> NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
> >>>       mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
> >>>
> >>> hdmirx-v1-1602/0001-clk-rockchip-rst-rk3588-Add-BIU-reset.patch has style problems, please review.
> >>>
> >>> I see the above warning but that looks like a false positive to me.
> >>
> >> Why for your patch it would be false positive and for all others would not?
> >>
> > 
> > OK, now I see what you meant. Since we are touching the include file and C file together, this warning was generated.
> > It was a bit confusing to interpret this as the warning also talks about Documentation which we didn't touch at all.
> 
> Really, no documentation touching? Care to check the full path of the
> files you are changing?
> 

Well, I meant the dt-binding doc for rst-rk3588

> 
> > 
> > Anyway, I will create two separate patches for this in v2.
> 
> I think rules cannot be clearer:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8-rc4/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L13
> 

right, it was my mistake and I think after this nice and kind feedback, I'll never make the same one again :)

Thanks,
Shreeya Patel

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> This list is managed by https://mailman.collabora.com