Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable zram, xfs and loading compressed FW support

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/02/2024 16:49, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:39:18PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/02/2024 16:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 13:59, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>> These options are needed by some Linux distributions (e.g: Fedora), so
>>>> let's enable them to make it easier for developers using such distros.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>> @@ -1595,6 +1599,7 @@ CONFIG_HTE_TEGRA194_TEST=m
>>>>  CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y
>>>>  CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y
>>>>  CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
>>>> +CONFIG_XFS_FS=m
>>>>  CONFIG_BTRFS_FS=m
>>>>  CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
>>>
>>> Unfortunately this will increase build time noticeably, but
>>> I agree it is the right thing to do.
>>>
>>> Can you send it (with any other acks) to soc@xxxxxxxxxx so
>>> I can merge it from there?
>>
>> Due to XFS, please include:
>>
>> Nacked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> so this will not be precedence used for further patches like this
>> (Maxime already used such argument, so I want to be sure it will not be
>> used against me in the future)
> 
> For the record, I didn't use anything against *you*. I'd just like
> consistency over how defconfig rules are applied.

True, apologies if it seemed to harsh. I meant the discussion, so maybe
better:
"Maxime used such argument with discussion with me, so I want to be sure
there is no silent ack from me in the future."

Best regards,
Krzysztof