[PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: sh_mmcif: sg_miter does not need to be atomic

[Linus Walleij]

All the sglist iterations happen in the *threaded* interrupt handler
and that context is not atomic, so don't request an atomic
sglist miter. Using an atomic miter results in "BUG: scheduling while
atomic" splats.

Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 27b57277d9ba ("mmc: sh_mmcif: Use sg_miter for PIO")
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi Geert, it'd be great if you could test this!
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c
index 1ef6e153e5a3..669555b5e8fa 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ static void sh_mmcif_single_read(struct sh_mmcif_host *host,
 			   BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) + 3;
 
 	sg_miter_start(&host->sg_miter, data->sg, data->sg_len,
-		       SG_MITER_ATOMIC | SG_MITER_TO_SG);
+		       SG_MITER_TO_SG);
 
 	host->wait_for = MMCIF_WAIT_FOR_READ;
 
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static void sh_mmcif_multi_read(struct sh_mmcif_host *host,
 		BLOCK_SIZE_MASK;
 
 	sg_miter_start(&host->sg_miter, data->sg, data->sg_len,
-		       SG_MITER_ATOMIC | SG_MITER_TO_SG);
+		       SG_MITER_TO_SG);
 
 	host->wait_for = MMCIF_WAIT_FOR_MREAD;
 
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ static void sh_mmcif_single_write(struct sh_mmcif_host *host,
 			   BLOCK_SIZE_MASK) + 3;
 
 	sg_miter_start(&host->sg_miter, data->sg, data->sg_len,
-		       SG_MITER_ATOMIC | SG_MITER_FROM_SG);
+		       SG_MITER_FROM_SG);
 
 	host->wait_for = MMCIF_WAIT_FOR_WRITE;
 
@@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ static void sh_mmcif_multi_write(struct sh_mmcif_host *host,
 		BLOCK_SIZE_MASK;
 
 	sg_miter_start(&host->sg_miter, data->sg, data->sg_len,
-		       SG_MITER_ATOMIC | SG_MITER_FROM_SG);
+		       SG_MITER_FROM_SG);
 
 	host->wait_for = MMCIF_WAIT_FOR_MWRITE;
 

-- 
2.34.1