Re: [PATCH 0/6] soc: qcom: pmic_glink_altmode: fix drm bridge use-after-free

[Johan Hovold]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 02:52:28PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 23/02/2024 13:51, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:03:10PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >> On 23/02/2024 12:02, Neil Armstrong wrote:

> >>> Thanks, Applied to https://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/drm/drm-misc.git (drm-misc-fixes)
> >>>
> >>> [1/6] drm/bridge: aux-hpd: fix OF node leaks
> >>>         https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=9ee485bdda68d6d3f5728cbe3150eb9013d7d22b
> >>> [2/6] drm/bridge: aux-hpd: separate allocation and registration
> >>>         (no commit info)
> >>> [3/6] soc: qcom: pmic_glink_altmode: fix drm bridge use-after-free
> >>>         (no commit info)
> >>> [4/6] soc: qcom: pmic_glink: Fix boot when QRTR=m
> >>>         (no commit info)
> >>> [5/6] phy: qcom-qmp-combo: fix drm bridge registration
> >>>         (no commit info)
> >>> [6/6] phy: qcom-qmp-combo: fix type-c switch registration
> >>>         (no commit info)
> >>>
> >>
> >> To clarify, I only applied patch 1 to drm-misc-fixes
> > 
> > Ok, but can you please not do that? :)
> > 
> > These patches should go in through the same tree to avoid conflicts.
> > 
> > I discussed this with Bjorn and Dmitry the other day and the conclusion
> > was that it was easiest to take all of these through DRM.
> 
> I only applied patch 1, which is a standalone fix and goes into a separate tree,
> for the next patches it would be indeed simpler for them to go via drm-misc when
> they are properly acked.

But it is *not* standalone as I tried to explain above.

So you have to drop it again as the later patches depend on it and
cannot be merged (through a different tree) without it.

I thought you had all the acks you needed to take this through drm-misc,
but we can wait a bit more if necessary (and there's no rush to get the
first one in).

Johan