Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 07/15] clk: samsung: Pass actual CPU clock registers base to CPU_CLK()

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 14:20:45 -0600, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> The documentation for struct exynos_cpuclk says .ctrl_base field should
> contain the controller base address. There are two different problems
> with that:
> 
> 1. All Exynos clock drivers are actually passing CPU_SRC register offset
>    via CPU_CLK() macro, which in turn gets assigned to mentioned
>    .ctrl_base field. Because CPU_SRC register usually already has 0x200
>    offset from controller's base, all other register offsets in
>    clk-cpu.c (like DIVs and MUXes) are specified as offsets from CPU_SRC
>    offset, and not from controller's base. That makes things confusing
>    and inconsistent with register offsets provided in Exynos clock
>    drivers, also breaking the contract for .ctrl_base field as described
>    in struct exynos_cpuclk doc.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[07/15] clk: samsung: Pass actual CPU clock registers base to CPU_CLK()
        https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/338f1c25269185cbea6e3dd966e5c859af2323f7

Best regards,
-- 
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>