Re: [PATCH] arm64/hw_breakpoint: Determine lengths from generic perf breakpoint macros

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 2/26/24 09:52, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Both platform i.e ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_X and generic i.e HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_X
> macros are used interchangeably to convert event->attr.bp_len and platform
> breakpoint control arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl->len. Let's be consistent while
> deriving one from the other. This does not cause any functional changes.
> 
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> This applies on v6.8-rc5
> 
>  arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 35225632d70a..1ab9fc865ddd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -301,28 +301,28 @@ static int get_hbp_len(u8 hbp_len)
>  
>  	switch (hbp_len) {
>  	case ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1:
> -		len_in_bytes = 1;
> +		len_in_bytes = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1;
>  		break;
>  	case ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2:
> -		len_in_bytes = 2;
> +		len_in_bytes = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2;
>  		break;
>  	case ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_3:
> -		len_in_bytes = 3;
> +		len_in_bytes = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_3;
>  		break;
>  	case ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_4:
> -		len_in_bytes = 4;
> +		len_in_bytes = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_4;
>  		break;
>  	case ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_5:
> -		len_in_bytes = 5;
> +		len_in_bytes = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_5;
>  		break;
>  	case ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_6:
> -		len_in_bytes = 6;
> +		len_in_bytes = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_6;
>  		break;
>  	case ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_7:
> -		len_in_bytes = 7;
> +		len_in_bytes = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_7;
>  		break;
>  	case ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8:
> -		len_in_bytes = 8;
> +		len_in_bytes = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8;
>  		break;
>  	}
>  

Please ignore this. Wrong patch got picked up in the git send-email :)