Re: [PATCH] time: Use div64_long() instead of do_div()

[Thorsten Blum]

> On Feb 26, 2024, at 04:28, Liao, Chang <liaochang1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I am considering using div64_ul() to calculate the result. as shift_hz is
> unsigned long, assume the sign bit of divisor cycles_per_tick never be set
> in this context,then div64_long() will do a extra sign extension for result.

Yes, div64_ul() is better and also removes the warning.

I'll submit a v2 shortly.

Thanks,
Thorsten