Re: [PATCH v4 03/11] fs: Initial atomic write support

[John Garry]

On 26/02/2024 09:13, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> > > maybe generic_atomic_write_valid()?
> > Having "generic" in the name implies that there are other ways in which
> > we can check if an atomic write is valid, but really this function
> > should be good to use in scenarios so far considered.
> It means individual FS can call in a generic atomic write validation
> helper instead of implementing of their own. Hence generic_atomic_write_valid().
>
> So for e.g. blkdev_atomic_write_valid() function and maybe iomap (or
> ext4 or xfs) can use a generic_atomic_write_valid() helper routine to
> validate an atomic write request.

ok, fine, I can change the name as suggested.

Thanks,
John