Re: [PATCH] ieee802154: ca8210: Drop spurious WQ_UNBOUND from alloc_ordered_workqueue() call

[Stefan Schmidt]

Hello,

On 06.02.24 00:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Workqueue is in the process of cleaning up the distinction between unbound
> workqueues w/ @nr_active==1 and ordered workqueues. Explicit WQ_UNBOUND
> isn't needed for alloc_ordered_workqueue() and will trigger a warning in the
> future. Let's remove it. This doesn't cause any functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c |   10 ++--------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> @@ -2857,19 +2857,13 @@ static int ca8210_interrupt_init(struct
>    */
>   static int ca8210_dev_com_init(struct ca8210_priv *priv)
>   {
> -	priv->mlme_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue(
> -		"MLME work queue",
> -		WQ_UNBOUND
> -	);
> +	priv->mlme_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("MLME work queue", 0);
>   	if (!priv->mlme_workqueue) {
>   		dev_crit(&priv->spi->dev, "alloc of mlme_workqueue failed!\n");
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   	}
>   
> -	priv->irq_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue(
> -		"ca8210 irq worker",
> -		WQ_UNBOUND
> -	);
> +	priv->irq_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("ca8210 irq worker", 0);
>   	if (!priv->irq_workqueue) {
>   		dev_crit(&priv->spi->dev, "alloc of irq_workqueue failed!\n");
>   		destroy_workqueue(priv->mlme_workqueue);

This patch has been applied to the wpan-next tree and will be
part of the next pull request to net-next. Thanks!

regards
Stefan Schmidt