Re: [PATCH 0/3] auxdisplay: 7 segment LED display

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Mon Feb 26 2024 - 19:59:12 EST


On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 2:52 AM Chris Packham
<Chris.Packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 26/02/24 15:23, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 11:34 PM Chris Packham
> > <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> This series adds a driver for a 7 segment LED display.
> >>
> >> I'd like to get some feedback on how this could be extended to support >1
> >> character. The driver as presented is sufficient for my hardware which only has
> >> a single character display but I can see that for this to be generically useful
> >> supporting more characters would be desireable.
> >>
> >> Earlier I posted an idea that the characters could be represended by
> >> sub-nodes[1] but there doesn't seem to be a way of having that and keeping the
> >> convenience of using devm_gpiod_get_array() (unless I've missed something).
> > It seems you didn't know that the tree for auxdisplay has been changed.
> > Can you rebase your stuff on top of
> > https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=20988&d=vfbb5fnU59kvIREfdD-21Pab30bpMpuTM2Ipv28now&u=https%3a%2f%2fgit%2ekernel%2eorg%2fpub%2fscm%2flinux%2fkernel%2fgit%2fandy%2flinux-auxdisplay%2egit%2flog%2f%3fh%3dfor-next%3f
> > It will reduce your code base by ~50%.
> >
> > WRT subnodes, you can go with device_for_each_child_node() and
> > retrieve gpio array per digit. It means you will have an array of
> > arrays of GPIOs.
>
> So would the following work?
>
> count = device_get_child_node_count(dev);
> struct gpio_descs **chars = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*chars) *
> count, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> i = 0;
> device_for_each_child_node(dev, child) {
> chars[i] = devm_gpiod_get_array(dev, "segment", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);

I see what you meant earlier.
This should be devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index(), but we lack the _array
variant of it...

Dunno what to do, maybe adding the _array variant is the good move,
maybe something else.

> }
>
> I haven't used the child. The devm_gpiod_get_array() will be looking at
> the fwnode of the parent.


--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko