Re: Audio dsp recovery using remoteproc

From: Mathieu Poirier
Date: Tue Feb 27 2024 - 12:10:16 EST


Good day,

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 03:29:56PM -0800, noman pouigt wrote:
> mailbox to dsp_1 is currently modeling platform pcm driver.
> mailbox to dsp_2 is also doing the same.
>
> Platform driver callbacks cause IPC to be sent to dsp's.
> Lifecycle of two dsp's are managed by separate remoteproc
> drivers. Single sound card is exposed.
>
> Separate watchdog interrupts from the corresponding dsp's
> are connected to remoteproc to manage crashing of the
> individual dsp's. How can I restart both the dsp when either
> of them crashes using the kernel device model? Remoteproc
> driver currently only restarts the crashed dsp instead of restarting
> both the dsp. It is needed to bring up the hardware in a consistent
> state as both the dsp's are connected to a common hardware.
>

Ok

> I thought of making a virtual parent remoteproc device
> and then managing individual dsp as a subdevice of that parent device
> but remoteproc device node is associated with the individual elf file i.e.
> it can manage only a single dsp.

You are on the right track but perhaps not fully aware of what is already done
for multi core remote processors. I suggest you have a thorough look at TI's
K3R5 driver[1] and one of it's DTB[2]. In the DTB each remote processor loads a
different firmware file, which seems to be what you are looking for.

Thanks,
Mathieu

[1]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8-rc6/source/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
[2]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8-rc6/source/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-mcu.dtsi#L397


>
> How can I model remoteproc drivers using linux device model so that when either
> of them crashes both the dsp's get reloaded by the remoteproc framework.
>
> MailBox ---- DSP_1 ---
> | |
> Linux ------ common_hw -> speaker/mic
> | |
> MailBox ---- DSP_2 ---
>