Re: [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: don't need to save tag bit in handle

From: Sergey Senozhatsky
Date: Tue Feb 27 2024 - 20:54:50 EST


On (24/02/27 16:16), Chengming Zhou wrote:
> On 2024/2/27 15:52, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (24/02/27 03:00), chengming.zhou@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>
> >> We only need to save the position (pfn + obj_idx) in the handle, don't
> >> need to save tag bit in handle. So one more bit can be used as obj_idx.
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >> mm/zsmalloc: don't need to save tag bit in handle
> >
> > Does this mean "don't need to reserve LSB for tag"?
> The head of object still need to reverve LSB, to save (handle | OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG),
> only the handle doesn't need to reserve LSB, which save (pfn | obj_idx).

Correct.

> > We still save allocated tag in the handle, that's what
> >
> > handle |= OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG;
>
> Yes, this result will be saved in the head of each allocated object.

Right, that's what I was talking about.

> >> Actually, the tag bit is only useful in zspage's memory space, to tell
> >> if an object is allocated or not.
> >
> > I'm not completely sure if I follow this sentence.
>
> What I mean is that only the head of each allocated object need to reverve LSB,
> which is used to check if allocated or not.
>
> handle address -> handle (pfn + obj_idx) -> object: (handle | tag), real_object start
>
> I'm not sure if this makes it clearer?

Yes, thanks. I think separating handle and object header in the commit
message will be helpful.