Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix per-policy boost behavior

[Sibi Sankar]

On 2/28/24 10:37, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27-02-24, 22:23, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > Fix per-policy boost behavior by incorporating per-policy boost flag
> > in the policy->max calculation and setting the correct per-policy
> > boost_enabled value on devices that use cpufreq_enable_boost_support().
>
> I don't see the problem explained anywhere and the patches look
> incorrect too. The drivers aren't supposed to update the
> policy->boose_enabled value.

Hey Viresh,
Thanks for taking time to review the series.

In the existing code, per-policy flags doesn't have any impact i.e.
if cpufreq_driver boost is enabled and one or more of the per-policy
boost is disabled, the cpufreq driver will behave as if boost is
enabled. I had to update the policy->boost_enabled value because we seem
to allow enabling cpufreq_driver.boost_enabled from the driver, but I
can drop that because it was just for book keeping. I didn't want
to include redundant info from another mail thread that I referenced in
the cover letter, but will add more info in the re-spin.

-Sibi

>