Re: [PATCH v2] net: raise RCU qs after each threaded NAPI poll
From: Yan Zhai
Date: Thu Feb 29 2024 - 22:50:23 EST
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:47 PM Yan Zhai <yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We noticed task RCUs being blocked when threaded NAPIs are very busy at
> workloads: detaching any BPF tracing programs, i.e. removing a ftrace
> trampoline, will simply block for very long in rcu_tasks_wait_gp. This
> ranges from hundreds of seconds to even an hour, severely harming any
> observability tools that rely on BPF tracing programs. It can be
> easily reproduced locally with following setup:
>
> ip netns add test1
> ip netns add test2
>
> ip -n test1 link add veth1 type veth peer name veth2 netns test2
>
> ip -n test1 link set veth1 up
> ip -n test1 link set lo up
> ip -n test2 link set veth2 up
> ip -n test2 link set lo up
>
> ip -n test1 addr add 192.168.1.2/31 dev veth1
> ip -n test1 addr add 1.1.1.1/32 dev lo
> ip -n test2 addr add 192.168.1.3/31 dev veth2
> ip -n test2 addr add 2.2.2.2/31 dev lo
>
> ip -n test1 route add default via 192.168.1.3
> ip -n test2 route add default via 192.168.1.2
>
> for i in `seq 10 210`; do
> for j in `seq 10 210`; do
> ip netns exec test2 iptables -I INPUT -s 3.3.$i.$j -p udp --dport 5201
> done
> done
>
> ip netns exec test2 ethtool -K veth2 gro on
> ip netns exec test2 bash -c 'echo 1 > /sys/class/net/veth2/threaded'
> ip netns exec test1 ethtool -K veth1 tso off
>
> Then run an iperf3 client/server and a bpftrace script can trigger it:
>
> ip netns exec test2 iperf3 -s -B 2.2.2.2 >/dev/null&
> ip netns exec test1 iperf3 -c 2.2.2.2 -B 1.1.1.1 -u -l 1500 -b 3g -t 100 >/dev/null&
> bpftrace -e 'kfunc:__napi_poll{@=count();} interval:s:1{exit();}'
>
> Above reproduce for net-next kernel with following RCU and preempt
> configuraitons:
>
> # RCU Subsystem
> CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
> # CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT is not set
> CONFIG_SRCU=y
> CONFIG_TREE_SRCU=y
> CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_GENERIC=y
> CONFIG_TASKS_RCU=y
> CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU=y
> CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU=y
> CONFIG_RCU_STALL_COMMON=y
> CONFIG_RCU_NEED_SEGCBLIST=y
> # end of RCU Subsystem
> # RCU Debugging
> # CONFIG_RCU_SCALE_TEST is not set
> # CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not set
> # CONFIG_RCU_REF_SCALE_TEST is not set
> CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT=21
> CONFIG_RCU_EXP_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT=0
> # CONFIG_RCU_TRACE is not set
> # CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG is not set
> # end of RCU Debugging
>
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_BUILD=y
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y
> CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
> CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y
> CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL=y
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT is not set
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACER is not set
> # CONFIG_PREEMPTIRQ_DELAY_TEST is not set
>
> An interesting observation is that, while tasks RCUs are blocked,
> related NAPI thread is still being scheduled (even across cores)
> regularly. Looking at the gp conditions, I am inclining to cond_resched
> after each __napi_poll being the problem: cond_resched enters the
> scheduler with PREEMPT bit, which does not account as a gp for tasks
> RCUs. Meanwhile, since the thread has been frequently resched, the
> normal scheduling point (no PREEMPT bit, accounted as a task RCU gp)
> seems to have very little chance to kick in. Given the nature of "busy
> polling" program, such NAPI thread won't have task->nvcsw or task->on_rq
> updated (other gp conditions), the result is that such NAPI thread is
> put on RCU holdouts list for indefinitely long time.
>
> This is simply fixed by adapting similar behavior of ksoftirqd: after
> the thread repolls for a while, raise a RCU QS to help expedite the
> tasks RCU grace period. No more blocking afterwards.
>
> Some brief iperf3 throughput testing in my VM with net-next kernel shows no
> noteable perf difference with 1500 byte MTU for 10 repeat runs each:
>
> Before:
> UDP: 3.073Gbps (+-0.070Gbps)
> TCP: 37.850Gbps (+-1.947Gbps)
>
> After:
> UDP: 3.077Gbps (+-0.121 Gbps)
> TCP: 38.120Gbps (+-2.272 Gbps)
>
> Note I didn't enable GRO for UDP so its throughput is lower than TCP.
>
> Fixes: 29863d41bb6e ("net: implement threaded-able napi poll loop support")
> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhai <yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v1->v2: moved rcu_softirq_qs out from bh critical section, and only
> raise it after a second of repolling. Added some brief perf test result.
>
Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/Zd4DXTyCf17lcTfq@debian.debian/T/#u
And I apparently forgot to rename the subject since it's not raising
after every poll (let me know if it is prefered to send a V3 to fix
it)
thanks
Yan
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 275fd5259a4a..76cff3849e1f 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -6751,9 +6751,12 @@ static int napi_threaded_poll(void *data)
> {
> struct napi_struct *napi = data;
> struct softnet_data *sd;
> + unsigned long next_qs;
> void *have;
>
> while (!napi_thread_wait(napi)) {
> + next_qs = jiffies + HZ;
> +
> for (;;) {
> bool repoll = false;
>
> @@ -6778,6 +6781,21 @@ static int napi_threaded_poll(void *data)
> if (!repoll)
> break;
>
> + /* cond_resched cannot unblock tasks RCU writers, so it
> + * is necessary to relax periodically and raise a QS to
> + * avoid starving writers under frequent repoll, e.g.
> + * ftrace trampoline clean up work. When not repoll,
> + * napi_thread_wait will enter sleep and have the same
> + * QS effect.
> + */
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) &&
> + time_after(jiffies, next_qs)) {
> + preempt_disable();
> + rcu_softirq_qs();
> + preempt_enable();
> + next_qs = jiffies + HZ;
> + }
> +
> cond_resched();
> }
> }
> --
> 2.30.2
>