Re: [RFC 3/8] iomap: Add atomic write support for direct-io

[John Garry]

> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20240124142645.9334-1-john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!PqMMFBeUqdWwlm0AxVyI_Vr1HPajTQ6AG2_GwK_IrhBSa-Wnz4cc-1w0LEFyTXY9Q9gT0WwhxvXloSqnOHb6Btg$
> >
> > and now this one.
> >
> > Can the two of you please co-ordinate your efforts and based your
> > filesysetm work off the same iomap infrastructure changes?
>
> Sure Dave, make sense. But we are cc'ing each other in this effort
> together so that we are aware of what is being worked upon.

Just cc'ing is not enough. I was going to send my v2 for XFS/iomap 
support today. I didn't announce that as I did not think that I had to. 
Admittedly it will be effectively an RFC, as the forcealign feature (now 
included) is not mature. But it's going to be a bit awkward to have 2x 
overlapping series' sent to the list.

FWIW, I think that it's better to send series based on top of other 
series, rather than cherry-picking necessary parts of other series (when 
posting)

Thanks,
John