Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvm: wire up KVM_CAP_VM_GPA_BITS for x86
From: Gerd Hoffmann
Date: Mon Mar 04 2024 - 06:48:18 EST
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 04:59:32PM +0800, Tao Su wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:43:53AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > > + kvm_caps.guest_phys_bits = boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits;
> > >
> > > When KeyID_bits is non-zero, MAXPHYADDR != boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits
> > > here, you can check in detect_tme().
> >
> > from detect_tme():
> >
> > /*
> > * KeyID bits effectively lower the number of physical address
> > * bits. Update cpuinfo_x86::x86_phys_bits accordingly.
> > */
> > c->x86_phys_bits -= keyid_bits;
> >
> > This looks like x86_phys_bits gets adjusted if needed.
>
> If TDP is enabled and supports 5-level, we want kvm_caps.guest_phys_bits=52,
> but c->x86_phys_bits!=52 here.
Do you talk about EPT or NPT or both?
> Maybe we need to set kvm_caps.guest_phys_bits
> according to whether TDP is enabled or not, like leaf 0x80000008 in
> __do_cpuid_func().
See patches 2+3 of this series.
Maybe it is better to just not set kvm_caps.guest_phys_bits in generic
kvm code and leave that completely to vmx / svm vendor modules. Or let
the generic code handle the !tdp_enabled case and have the vendor
modules override (considering EPT / NPT limitations) in case tdp is
enabled.
take care,
Gerd