Re: [bug report] dead loop in generic_perform_write() //Re: [PATCH v7 07/12] iov_iter: Convert iterate*() to inline funcs

[David Howells]

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Actually, I think the right model is to get rid of that horrendous
> .copy_mc field entirely.
> 
> We only have one single place that uses it - that nasty core dumping
> code. And that code is *not* performance critical.
> 
> And not only isn't it performance-critical, it already does all the
> core dumping one page at a time because it doesn't want to write pages
> that were never mapped into user space.
> 
> So what we can do is
> 
>  (a) make the core dumping code *copy* the page to a good location
> with copy_mc_to_kernel() first
> 
>  (b) remove this horrendous .copy_mc crap entirely from iov_iter
> 
> This is slightly complicated by the fact that copy_mc_to_kernel() may
> not even exist, and architectures that don't have it don't want the
> silly extra copy. So we need to abstract the "copy to temporary page"
> code a bit. But that's probably a good thing anyway in that it forces
> us to have nice interfaces.
> 
> End result: something like the attached.
> 
> AGAIN: THIS IS ENTIRELY UNTESTED.
> 
> But hey, so was clearly all the .copy_mc code too that this removes, so...

I like it:-)

I've tested it by SIGQUIT'ing a number of processes and using gdb to examine
the coredumps - which seems to work - at least without the production of any
MCEs.  I'm not sure how I could test it with MCEs.

Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>

That said, I wonder if:

	#ifdef copy_mc_to_kernel

should be:

	#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC

and whether it's possible to find out dynamically if MCEs can occur at all.

David